[OSGeo-Conf] FOSS4G2023 bid process stage two: questions time

[Mark Iliffe]

Hi All,

My concerns pivot as usual around the TGP and how we are helping extend
access to others outside our scope? What is the ambition?

Cheers,

Mark

On Wed, 11 May 2022 at 11:09, Steven Feldman <shfeldman at gmail.com> wrote:

> Apologies, I am late responding
>
> No additional questions from me
> ______
> Steven
>
> Unusual maps in strange places -  mappery.org
>
> Subscribe to my weekly “Maps in the Wild <http://eepurl.com/dKStT-/>”
> newsletter
>
> On 3 May 2022, at 21:57, Vasile Craciunescu <vasile at geo-spatial.org>
> wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> The full proposal for hosting FOSS4G2023 was received in  due time from
> the Prizren LOC. Due to the size of the attachment, the email was rejected
> by our mailing list. Please go through the proposal [1] and place your
> questions [2] before 9th of May. Many thanks to Prizren LOC for delivering
> the full bid proposal! We truly appreciate the effort!
>
> Warm regards,
> Vasile
>
> [1]
> https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS4G_2023_Bid_Process#Bid_Process_Stage_Two
> [2]
> https://wiki.osgeo.org/w/index.php?title=Q%26A_Stage_2_Prizren&action=edit&redlink=1
> _______________________________________________
> Conference_dev mailing list
> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Conference_dev mailing list
> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/conference_dev/attachments/20220515/9e34bee8/attachment.htm>