[OSGeo-Discuss] Packaging an Integrated Geospatial Stack

Shorter, Cameron cameron.shorter at adi-limited.com
Wed Aug 16 19:24:12 PDT 2006


It looks like http://pkg-grass.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuGIS are already doing a good job packaging GIS
for the debian/ubuntu platform.
We should ask them to consider joining the OSGeo Foundation.

The Debian/Ubuntu GIS packaging could then be used to bootstrap a
multi-platform Distribution project.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Frank Warmerdam [mailto:warmerdam at pobox.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, 17 August 2006 12:01 PM
> To: discuss at mail.osgeo.org
> Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Packaging an Integrated Geospatial Stack
> 
> Shorter, Cameron wrote:
> > Frank,
> > Your wiki is an excellent start.
> > I think the next step is:
> 
> Cameron,
> 
> I'd add a point zero in this list which is get someone 
> involved to lead the effort (at least for a while).
> 
> > 1. Define specific user use cases for GIS software.
> > Eg: A user has a shapefile and they want to display it to 
> the public 
> > over the web using a basemap provided by someone else (eg Google).
> > Ideally, we can get some users to help define the use 
> cases, then fund 
> > the Geospatial Stack project.
> 
> I see two general user categories:
> 
>   1) desktop user, data visualization, analysis, etc.
>   2) web application developer
> 
> Given the nature of our project set, I suspect I'd target the 
> web application developer first.  But I think the goal is to 
> include as many OSGeo projects as are practical rather than 
> just target a specific user need.
> 
> > 2. Identify a set of milestones for the software stack.
> > Eg: Release 1:
> > * Postgis database
> > * Geoserver/Mapserver WMS/WFS
> > * Mapbuilder/Mapbender WMS/WFS client
> > 
> > Release 2:
> > Release 3: ...
> > 
> > 
> > 3. Identify target platform and distribution medium.
> > Eg: Ubuntu linux, get incorporated into the core Ubuntu 
> linux distribution.
> 
> I have taken the position so far that on linux we should be 
> delivering a distribution agnostic software suite rather than 
> trying to produce stuff for each distribution.  For 
> distribution "integrated" solutions, I would suggest 
> supporting existing efforts (such as the Debian GIS effort) 
> but what I invisage from OSGeo is an "all included" suite 
> that won't suffer from package dependency hell, as I've seen 
> with some many other efforts.  In this regard, I see the 
> effort being more like FGS or FWTools than like Debian GIS or 
> various efforts to provide specific RPMs for particular 
> versions of redhat/fedoracore.
> 
> On windows I would also aim for an all-included approach 
> without people having to separately download and install components.
> 
> > 4. Create a distribution project
> > I think the distribution project should be treated in a 
> similar manner 
> > to the other participating projects. It should contain email lists, 
> > bug trackers, Project Steering Committee etc.
> 
> I'd agree to a degree.  I'm not so sure it should go through 
> incubation.
> Or if it does, we can expect it to sit in incubation for 
> quite some time till it developers a community.  Actually, it 
> sitting in incubation for quite a while wouldn't be a terrible thing.
> 
> Best regards,
> -- 
> ---------------------------------------+----------------------
> ----------
> ---------------------------------------+------
> I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam, 
> warmerdam at pobox.com
> light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
> and watch the world go round - Rush    | President OSGF, 
> http://osgeo.org
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: discuss-unsubscribe at mail.osgeo.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: discuss-help at mail.osgeo.org
> 


DISCLAIMER:---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This Email may contain confidential and/or privileged information and is intended 
solely for the addressee(s) named. If you have received this information in error, or
are advised that you have been posted this Email by accident, please notify the 
sender by return Email, do not redistribute it, delete the Email and keep no copies.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




More information about the Discuss mailing list