[OSGeo-Discuss] project tracker question

Andrew Kelly akelly at collab.net
Wed Jul 5 08:41:33 PDT 2006


Good deal.  As for your question about enhancements, it completely
depends on (a) the amount of enhancement activity in the project and (b)
the level of granularity wanted in managing the enhancement process.  If
the project has pushed ownership down to the component level, or plans a
roadmap at the component level, then I think its appropriate to have
that field in the artifact.

I'm a fan of some process around the enhancement program for an open
source project, largely to get some visibility and dialog going around
possible directions for the software.  If this is something you feel
mapguide could benefit from, just let Bob Bray know and we'll work with
him to beef up that artifact/process a bit.

Cheers,
Andrew 

Andrew Kelly | Practice Manager Developer Networks | CollabNet, Inc.
8000 Marina Blvd. Suite 600 | Brisbane, CA 94005 | USA
O 781.639.1394 | C 908.489.4358 | akelly at collab.net



 


-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Spencer [mailto:pspencer at dmsolutions.ca] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 11:17 AM
To: discuss at mail.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] project tracker question

Andrew,

you are correct.  I was already on the advanced query tab but I  
didn't refine the choice to just defects or just enhancements.

I see now that enhancements don't identify a component ... I hadn't  
realized that (do you think that enhancements should be targeted at  
specific components/sub-components?)

I'm not sure that a change is necessary now that I understand how the  
system works.  Thanks for the rapid response.

Cheers

Paul

On 5-Jul-06, at 10:42 AM, Andrew Kelly wrote:

> Paul,
>
> I'm fairly sure I know what you are running into.  When you query on
> multiple artifact types (in your case, defects and enhancements) the
> query window only displays as choices the fields that are common to
> both.  I just checked out the enhancement artifact, and it doesn't
> include sub-component, hence you don't see that field when you  
> query for
> enhancements.
>
> In this case, you should only choose "defect" as the artifact type in
> the query, and you'll get all those fields to choose from.  It also
> sounds to me like you may want to extend the "enhancement" artifact to
> include more field.  If that's the case, work with me and I'll make  
> the
> changes.  I'll need to know what fields you see in "defect" that are
> relevant in "enhancement", and I'll add them.
>
> One other note, just for your own knowledge.  PT has 2 query tabs:
> "query" and "advanced query".  The "query" tab includes only those
> fields that are commonly queried on, while the "advanced query" tab
> contains all fields of an artifact.  Most fields in the mapguide
> "defect" artifact have been tagged as common, so I don't think we  
> have a
> problem there.
>
> Let me know if you need any more help, and if you want changes made to
> the "enhancement" artifact.
>
> Cheers,
> Andrew K.
> CollabNet
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Spencer [mailto:pspencer at dmsolutions.ca]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 10:07 AM
> To: discuss at mail.osgeo.org
> Cc: Auke Jilderda
> Subject: [OSGeo-Discuss] project tracker question
>
> Not sure where to post this question as it is a general question
> about the CN infrastructure rather than project-specific.  I guess
> this is targeted at Auke :)
>
> I would like to have a pre-defined query that returns all open
> defects and enhancements for a specific sub-component of the mapguide
> project.  When creating an issue in the project tracker, there are
> all kinds of useful(?) fields that are entered, including the fields
> I am particularly interested in (in this case).  However, when
> querying the project tracker, none of these fields seem to be
> accessible for creating a query.  Am I missing something?
>
> Cheers
>
> Paul
>
> +-----------------------------------------------------------------+
> |Paul Spencer                           pspencer at dmsolutions.ca   |
> +-----------------------------------------------------------------+
> |Applications & Software Development                              |
> |DM Solutions Group Inc                 http://www.dmsolutions.ca/|
> +-----------------------------------------------------------------+
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: discuss-unsubscribe at mail.osgeo.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: discuss-help at mail.osgeo.org
>

+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
|Paul Spencer                           pspencer at dmsolutions.ca   |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
|Applications & Software Development                              |
|DM Solutions Group Inc                 http://www.dmsolutions.ca/|
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: discuss-unsubscribe at mail.osgeo.org
For additional commands, e-mail: discuss-help at mail.osgeo.org





More information about the Discuss mailing list