[OSGeo-Discuss] ISO 19115
Jeroen Ticheler
Jeroen.Ticheler at fao.org
Wed May 16 00:32:46 PDT 2007
Hi,
In GeoNetwork opensource ( http://geonetwork-opensource.org ) we've
been using ISO19115 for a long time now. We are now finalizing a
release of the software that has among other things, support for the
following standards:
Metadata: ISO19115 validated against ISO19139 implementation standard.
FGDC
Dublin Core
Catalog: OGC CAT 1.0 & Z39.50
OGC CSW 2.0.1 based on the ISO profile
GeoNetwork opensource is an incubator project of OSGEO and can be
found at http://www.osgeo.org/geonetwork
We find it useful and have been using it to document large numbers of
spatial datasets. For example at http://www.fao.org/geonetwork (where
I work), http://vam.wfp.org/vamsie , http://geonetwork.unocha.org/
mapsondemand and http://csi.cgiar.org/geonetwork to name a few. All
these organizations share their metadata collections among catalogs.
Ciao,
Jeroen
_______________________
Jeroen Ticheler
FAO-UN
Tel: +39 06 57056041
http://www.fao.org/geonetwork
42.07420°N 12.34343°E
On 16 May 2007, at 7:40 AM, Raj Singh wrote:
> In the geospatial standards community (I work for OGC), ISO 19115
> is sort of a bible. The problem with this, and most ISO documents,
> is that it's too abstract to design software around. You generally
> need to go to another level of specificity to do real coding. For
> example, the OGC catalog work <http://www.opengeospatial.org/
> standards/cat> conforms to ISO 19115 and gets much closer to
> something implementable.
> ---
> Raj
>
>
> On May 15, 2007, at 9:13 PM,
> nicholas.g.lawrence at mainroads.qld.gov.au wrote:
>
>>
>> I noticed the existance of ISO 19115
>>
>> http://www.iso.org/iso/en/CatalogueDetailPage.CatalogueDetail?
>> CSNUMBER=26020&ICS1=35&ICS2=240&ICS3=70
>>
>> Particularly "the cataloguing of datasets"
>>
>> Has anyone read this? Is it useful?
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
More information about the Discuss
mailing list