[OSGeo-Discuss] Image Management in an RDBMS...(was OS Spatial environment 'sizing')
Paul Ramsey
pramsey at cleverelephant.ca
Thu Feb 21 20:36:58 PST 2008
Bruce,
I am not taking issue with database management of vector data sets,
but with the stuffing of raster data into databases. I still have not
heard a compelling use case for raster in the database.
12 million records is teensy. Stuff it into PostGIS. It's the billion-
point LIDAR sets that leave me queasy, but I can't begin to think of a
reasonable architecture for that without learning more about how the
points are actually USED, which I really am not clear on at the moment.
P.
On Feb 21, 2008, at 5:25 PM, Bruce.Bannerman at dpi.vic.gov.au wrote:
>
> IMO:
>
> Paul,
>
> >
> > On Feb 21, 2008, at 4:19 PM, Bruce.Bannerman at dpi.vic.gov.au wrote:
> > >
> > > What it comes down to is what is appropriate for your use case.
> >
> > Indeed! However, there seem to be vanishingly few use cases for
> which
> > raster-in-database is actually the more appropriate solution.
> >
>
> ;-) I beg to differ.
>
>
> > (BTW, point-in-time recovery, a nice example of a place where
> database
> > semantics have an upper hand. Although more modern file systems and
> > enterprise backup systems are pretty competitive now... even a
> > relatively simple hack like the OS/X Time Machine feature solves
> that
> > problem for-all-practical-purposes.)
> >
>
>
> Trying to manage very large regional datasets via a file based
> solution is problematic as described earlier with tile based
> approach to vector data in particular. Again for my use case the DB
> is better.
>
>
> Just to throw in another related issue:
>
> Lidar systems are throwing out an enormous amount of data. I had one
> dataset of only around 17 million odd records several years ago (of
> course stored in our corporate db ;-) ) that we could not handle
> with ArcGIS Desktop (v9.1). From memory it was a 32bit issue.
>
> What approaches are people using with large Lidar datasets?
>
>
> Bruce
>
>
> Notice:
> This email and any attachments may contain information that is
> personal, confidential,
> legally privileged and/or copyright. No part of it should be
> reproduced, adapted or communicated without the prior written
> consent of the copyright owner.
>
> It is the responsibility of the recipient to check for and remove
> viruses.
>
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender
> by return email, delete it from your system and destroy any copies.
> You are not authorised to use, communicate or rely on the
> information contained in this email.
>
> Please consider the environment before printing this email.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
--
Paul Ramsey
pramsey at cleverelephant.ca
+1 250 885 0632
More information about the Discuss
mailing list