[OSGeo-Discuss] Thematic Mapping Engine as Open Source?
Cameron Shorter
cameron.shorter at gmail.com
Tue Jun 24 00:35:57 PDT 2008
Chris and Dave are right, I'd strongly suggest using a less restrictive
license than GPL as you will likely increase your developer base.
Dave McIlhagga wrote:
> On 23-Jun-08, at 11:40 AM, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
>
>> Bjorn Sandvik ha scritto:
>>
>>> I'll consider the pros and cons between different licenses. I don't
>>> have
>>> commercial interests,
>>> but I would like the project to be sustainable.
>>>
>>> I've changed my mind about using SourceForge, - I agree that Google
>>> Code
>>> is more suitable.
>>
>> Please note:
>> - GPL is more widely used
>> - many people prefers it, for good reasons (too long to explain here)
>> - Google Code apparently puts severe restrictions on exporting code to
>> several countries.
>> All the best.
>
> Similarly there are many good reasons for the long-term sustainability
> of the project to embrace a more open license such as the BSD which
> welcomes all participants - even if they have proprietary commercial
> interest. We avoid GPL like the plague for exactly this reason.
>
> Dave
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
--
Cameron Shorter
Geospatial Systems Architect
Tel: +61 (0)2 8570 5050
Mob: +61 (0)419 142 254
Think Globally, Fix Locally
Commercial Support for Geospatial Open Source Solutions
http://www.lisasoft.com/LISAsoft/SupportedProducts.html
More information about the Discuss
mailing list