[OSGeo-Discuss] on Google Code and export restrictions
Wilfred L. Guerin
wilfredguerin at gmail.com
Tue May 27 07:43:31 PDT 2008
LETS SEE you FIND A BALL IN A PICTURE
And the same for your policy contacts, please.
Restricting freedom of thought of children is a crime against humanity.
I have watched american "policy" thugs rip balls from childrens hands
and threaten them as if they were a hardened combat warrior while
reciting policy against their innocence and that of a common ball.
THIS is your policy.
(posted in ethical obligation)
DieBold.
On 5/27/08, P Kishor <punkish at eidesis.org> wrote:
> On 5/27/08, Chris Puttick <chris.puttick at thehumanjourney.net> wrote:
>>
>> ----- "Frank Warmerdam" <warmerdam at pobox.com> wrote:
>> > Dave Patton wrote:
>> > > Frank Warmerdam wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> I agree that we ought to consider developing a similar policy to
>> > >> Apache's. I'll add an agenda item for the next board meeting to
>> > >> start digging into this.
>> > >
>> > > One item for discussion would be what takes place
>> > > when a project enters incubation. Do they "opt in"
>> > > to the OSGeo policy? If they don't, are they then
>> > > excluded from being an OSGeo project? Can they
>> > > "opt in", and yet maintain their own project
>> > > infrastructure (website, svn, download links, etc.)
>> > > on servers in another country, and have access
>> > > to that infrastructure be subject to policies that
>> > > may conflict with the OSGeo policy?
>> >
>> > Dave,
>> >
>> > Projects going through incubation are allowed to maintain their own
>> > distinct infrastructure, wherever they want for the most part. But
>> > they are still board as a project to follow OSGeo policy and obey
>> > applicable US laws even if their download server (for instance) is
>> > not in the US.
>> >
>> > Best regards,
>> > --
>> >
>> ---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
>> > I set the clouds in motion - turn up | Frank Warmerdam,
>> > warmerdam at pobox.com
>> > light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
>> > and watch the world go round - Rush | President OSGeo,
>> > http://osgeo.org
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Discuss mailing list
>> > Discuss at lists.osgeo.org
>> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>
>>
>> Then I respectfully suggest, insofar as some recent US laws are at a level
>> of paranoia that might prevent some open source software from actually
>> being open. that OSGeo should consider reconstituting itself in a country
>> that is less totalitarian in its attitudes.
>
>
> Easy now. Prefixing "respectfully" to assertions of "paranoia" and
> "totalitarian" to a country whose funding and work gave rise to
> MapServer is not a good strategy. In fact, it would be difficult to
> conceive of open source itself without the contributions of this
> "totalitarian" and "paranoid" country.
>
> National-level security-related policy decisions are not usually made
> with consideration of their impact on every conceivable issue. The key
> is to constructively find a way around it, which many on this list are
> trying to do. I am sure OSGeo is not the first group to face this
> situation.
>
> For starters, I am asking around with my policy-contacts to see what
> light they can shed on this.
>
>
>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Chris
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------
>> Files attached to this email may be in ISO 26300 format (OASIS Open
>> Document Format). If you have difficulty opening them, please visit
>> http://iso26300.info for more information.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss mailing list
>> Discuss at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>
>
>
> --
> Puneet Kishor http://punkish.eidesis.org/
> Nelson Institute for Environmental Studies http://www.nelson.wisc.edu/
> Open Source Geospatial Foundation (OSGeo) http://www.osgeo.org/
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
More information about the Discuss
mailing list