[OSGeo-Discuss] discussion or FUD

Bruce, Bob (CON) Bob.Bruce at gov.mb.ca
Sat Oct 10 12:59:36 PDT 2009

Then there is "The Price of "FREE" Open Source Software has really
become Expensive!!" at

It is easy to make all kinds of statements when you aren't accountable
for them and when they are not peer-reviewed.

I wouldn't lose any sleep over this.

	Bob Bruce

-----Original Message-----
From: discuss-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:discuss-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Bart van den
Eijnden (OSGIS)
Sent: Saturday, October 10, 2009 7:19 AM
To: cavallini at faunalia.it
Cc: OSGeo Discussions
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] discussion or FUD

It's a rainy day here and why not read some more of his blog I thought, 
until I encountered:


Best regards,

Paolo Cavallini wrote:
> Bart van den Eijnden (OSGIS) ha scritto:
>> Thanks for attending us to this thread Paolo.
>> FUD is the word for sure. More fud from the same guy on the benchmark
>> exercise:
> Ha! This says something ;)
> "I find myself spending such a HUGE part of my time getting the
competitive software
> to even "work" to do the test."
> How log do any of us take to have a running mapserver or geoserver? ;)
> Thanks Bart for letting know.
> All the best.

Bart van den Eijnden
OSGIS, Open Source GIS
bartvde at osgis.nl

Discuss mailing list
Discuss at lists.osgeo.org

More information about the Discuss mailing list