[OSGeo-Discuss] Comparison

[Pablo Carreira]

Jovi Wrote
>(...) help me getting an overview and
comparison of some of the Servers such as MapServer, GeoServer and
Deegree.

>what's the strength and
weakness of each server in some particular scenario
>I could never answer
these questions without ever using them, right? 

 
I have exactly the same doubts, but for me, a beginer in webmaping, the report does not help much.

So, I kindly ask the comunity members for their personal opinion, to point in a single line what is the strong and the week point of each of the servers.

For example:
- ServerX. good:Nice results in little time.  Bad:Limited resources.


Regards, Pablo.



> Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 11:23:30 -0700
> From: sstein at geo.uzh.ch
> To: seven at arnulf.us; discuss at lists.osgeo.org
> Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Comparison
> CC: 
> 
> same for me - I stumbled over this page after a hint from Markus - and 
> nobody ever asked us to have a look over it or send an email.
> 
> Arnulf Christl (aka Seven) wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 15:28 +0100, Andrea Aime wrote:
> >> Rafal Wawer ha scritto:
> >>> Hi Jovi,
> >>> For a start you can take a look at the evaluation results of CASCADOSS 
> >>> project - you will find there also other types of FOSS4G software too.
> >>> http://www.cascadoss.eu/en/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=16&Itemid=16 
> >>> <http://www.cascadoss.eu/en/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=16&Itemid=16>
> >>>  
> >>> The evaluation is a bit out of date - valid for early 2008, but the 
> >>> evaluation method itself may provide the clues how to look at  and 
> >>> compare FOSS4G software projects.
> >> I am wondering if the GeoServer report was submitted to the GeoServer
> >> community for double checking? I've noticed a few errors in the report
> >> (even for beginning 2008).
> >> For example we had in-build testing since spring 2007, the project
> >> was already more than 5 years old in 2008 and so on.
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >> Andrea
> > 
> > Andrea, 
> > I also noticed some inconsistencies and omissions in that document. This
> > is the general problem with canned information that has not been passed
> > by the relevant communities. It would be much easier to have this type
> > of documents available in an editable format like a Wiki. I wonder why
> > OSGeo has not got around to producing something similar? It is obviously
> > a hard task but if we (OSGeo folks) do not manage to get it done well,
> > who will? 
> > 
> > Best regards, 
> > Arnulf. 
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
 		 	   		  
_________________________________________________________________
No Messenger você pode tranformar sua imagem de exibição num vídeo. Veja aqui!
http://www.windowslive.com.br/public/tip.aspx/view/97?product=2&ocid=Windows Live:Dicas - Imagem Dinamica:Hotmail:Tagline:1x1:Mexa-se
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20100218/18b1f027/attachment-0002.html>