pablotcarreira at hotmail.com
Thu Feb 18 11:35:16 PST 2010
>(...) help me getting an overview and
comparison of some of the Servers such as MapServer, GeoServer and
>what's the strength and
weakness of each server in some particular scenario
>I could never answer
these questions without ever using them, right?
I have exactly the same doubts, but for me, a beginer in webmaping, the report does not help much.
So, I kindly ask the comunity members for their personal opinion, to point in a single line what is the strong and the week point of each of the servers.
- ServerX. good:Nice results in little time. Bad:Limited resources.
> Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 11:23:30 -0700
> From: sstein at geo.uzh.ch
> To: seven at arnulf.us; discuss at lists.osgeo.org
> Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Comparison
> same for me - I stumbled over this page after a hint from Markus - and
> nobody ever asked us to have a look over it or send an email.
> Arnulf Christl (aka Seven) wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 15:28 +0100, Andrea Aime wrote:
> >> Rafal Wawer ha scritto:
> >>> Hi Jovi,
> >>> For a start you can take a look at the evaluation results of CASCADOSS
> >>> project - you will find there also other types of FOSS4G software too.
> >>> http://www.cascadoss.eu/en/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=16&Itemid=16
> >>> <http://www.cascadoss.eu/en/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=16&Itemid=16>
> >>> The evaluation is a bit out of date - valid for early 2008, but the
> >>> evaluation method itself may provide the clues how to look at and
> >>> compare FOSS4G software projects.
> >> I am wondering if the GeoServer report was submitted to the GeoServer
> >> community for double checking? I've noticed a few errors in the report
> >> (even for beginning 2008).
> >> For example we had in-build testing since spring 2007, the project
> >> was already more than 5 years old in 2008 and so on.
> >> Cheers
> >> Andrea
> > Andrea,
> > I also noticed some inconsistencies and omissions in that document. This
> > is the general problem with canned information that has not been passed
> > by the relevant communities. It would be much easier to have this type
> > of documents available in an editable format like a Wiki. I wonder why
> > OSGeo has not got around to producing something similar? It is obviously
> > a hard task but if we (OSGeo folks) do not manage to get it done well,
> > who will?
> > Best regards,
> > Arnulf.
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.osgeo.org
No Messenger você pode tranformar sua imagem de exibição num vídeo. Veja aqui!
http://www.windowslive.com.br/public/tip.aspx/view/97?product=2&ocid=Windows Live:Dicas - Imagem Dinamica:Hotmail:Tagline:1x1:Mexa-se
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Discuss