[OSGeo-Discuss] RE: Discuss Digest, Vol 37, Issue 21 - Open Source for Utility Companies
Alicia Farag
Alicia.Farag at GASTECHNOLOGY.ORG
Tue Jan 19 09:17:48 PST 2010
All, I am looking for similar information on opportunities for open source data and applications that the utility industry could use. I too am putting together a proposal related to leveraging other people's data and opportunities for sharing and collaboration within the utility industry. Any information on current initiatives or general information resources would be appreciated.
Regards,
Alicia
-----Original Message-----
From: discuss-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:discuss-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of discuss-request at lists.osgeo.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 11:00 AM
To: discuss at lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Discuss Digest, Vol 37, Issue 21
Send Discuss mailing list submissions to
discuss at lists.osgeo.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
discuss-request at lists.osgeo.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
discuss-owner at lists.osgeo.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Discuss digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Looking for information about Open Data practicesand how
it help to foster collaboration. (Bob Basques)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 08:43:32 -0600
From: "Bob Basques" <Bob.Basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us>
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Looking for information about Open Data
practicesand how it help to foster collaboration.
To: "OSGeo Discussions" <discuss at lists.osgeo.org>
Message-ID: <4B5570B4.163B.00A8.0 at ci.stpaul.mn.us>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
All,
Thanks for all the links to information, I've got a pretty good list of Federal initiatives, now I'm after more localized efforts, something at the City or Municipal level. Really it can be anything related to making government (geospatial) data available to the masses and why it makes sense.
I will post my (short) write-up here as well.
Thanks again.
bobb
>>> Haris Kurtagic <haris at sl-king.com> wrote:
I really like presentation from Jason Birch from City of Nanaimo about reasons to open data and how to do it. http://www.slideshare.net/JasonBirch/moving-beyond-the-desk
( http://www.slideshare.net/JasonBirch/moving-beyond-the-desk )Don't forget to look at notes too, I did forgot first time.
Haris
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Bob Basques
<Bob.Basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us>
wrote:
All,
I'm putting together a proposal here at the City to open up more of our datasets to the public. We currently have about 30 GIS data layers available to the public, ( http://, ) with ~170 layers that are not public. While there are some layers that won't be made available for security or licensing issues, there are many that the owners of simply don't want to make available.
I'm looking for information to include in a short proposal that might sway some of the folks sitting on datasets internally to get them to publish the data to the masses and need points of reasoning to point them at.
I already have some info related to general practices moving towards this type of data availability, and some of the recent threads on the OSGEO lists about data licensing would likely come into play as well.
Thanks for any pointers on this.
bobb
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20100119/ff9b03f4/attachment-0001.html
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
End of Discuss Digest, Vol 37, Issue 21
***************************************
This communication is for the use of the intended recipient only. It may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this communication, the disclosure, copying, distribution or use hereof is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please advise me by return e-mail or by telephone and then delete it immediately.
More information about the Discuss
mailing list