[OSGeo-Discuss] 5 Star OSGeo project maturity rating

[Stefan Steiniger]

speaking for a project, i.e. OpenJUMP, that will probably not enter 
OSGeo in the near future (its not that we don't want [we had a positive 
vote for last year], but a lack of - volunteer - time to do the 
necessary efforts and rather concentrate on improvements of the software):

I am fine with 5 stars as long as this ranking would be decribed 
somewhere at the bottom of the flyer - because we could have at max 3 
stars. Now, is there space for that?

And... the ranking doesn't need to be science (i like all the criteria 
outlined by Andrea, but...): The simpler the better to understand for 
the "potential user".

stefan