[OSGeo-Discuss] Re: Discuss Digest, Vol 45, Issue 24
james.reid at ed.ac.uk
Mon Sep 13 07:19:56 PDT 2010
Re: statistical support
R is a good bet but you might also want to check out PySAL
On 13/09/10 14:52, discuss-request at lists.osgeo.org wrote:
> Send Discuss mailing list submissions to
> discuss at lists.osgeo.org
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> discuss-request at lists.osgeo.org
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> discuss-owner at lists.osgeo.org
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Discuss digest..."
> Today's Topics:
> 1. Re: Re: Best GIS with below listed requirements
> (Christopher Schmidt)
> 2. Staistical analysis support needed (mayank_agarwal)
> 3. Re: Best GIS with below listed requirements (mayank_agarwal)
> 4. Re: Staistical analysis support needed (Christopher Schmidt)
> 5. Re: Staistical analysis support needed (mayank_agarwal)
> 6. Re: Staistical analysis support needed (Noli Sicad)
> 7. Re: Staistical analysis support needed (Pieter De Graef)
> 8. Re: Staistical analysis support needed (mayank_agarwal)
> 9. Re: Re: Staistical analysis support needed (Christopher Schmidt)
> 10. Re: Staistical analysis support needed (mayank_agarwal)
> 11. Re: Staistical analysis support needed (Edmar Moretti)
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 06:17:28 -0400
> From: Christopher Schmidt<crschmidt at crschmidt.net>
> Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Re: Best GIS with below listed
> To: OSGeo Discussions<discuss at lists.osgeo.org>
> Message-ID:<20100913101728.GB13509 at crschmidt.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 10:09:45PM -0700, mayank_agarwal wrote:
>> Thank you Everyone.
>> And sorry for not being clear, actually i want a GIS which is web based as
>> many clients would be acting on it at the same time, we being on server
>> side, as a desktop GIS does not has this feature.
>> So I would like for suggestions on that, Geomajas is a good option, but
>> still open for suggestions.
> In general, there are a couple things you can do.
> 1. For a full WebGIS solution, it seems like Geomajas is the primary
> option. It comes set up with GIS functionality out of the box, and
> many people seem to be using it this way successfully.
> 2. If what you're most interested in is a UI for managing a bunch of
> GIS data, what you may be interested in may actually be something
> like Mapbender, which is a geospatial data portal.
> 3. If you want to 'roll your own' -- for example, if you only need a
> limited set of functionality -- then OpenLayers+GeoExt+MapFish
> provide a set of reasonable tools to work with to create your own.
> There are a number of service providers -- like OpenGeo,
> Camptocamp -- who can provide development services support to help
> you implement a solution in this vein.
> Another option that I know less about is GeoMoose. A third option I also
> know less about is MapGuide's 'Fusion' toolkit. GeoMoose is generally
> tied relatively closely to MapServer, I believe, though I could be wrong
> on that. MapGuide Fusion is tied relatively closely to MapGuide; at one
> point there was some work on extending it to also talk to MapServer,
> though I don't know how far that went.
> OpenGeo may also have some aspect of the GeoServer toolkit that fulfills
> this need, but nothing comes to mind off the top of my head. I believe
> something like OpenGeo's "GeoNode" is actually a 'competitor' of sorts
> to something like Mapbender, a combination of catalog services and tools
> to manage and browse them.
> If I have misspoken about any of the projects described here, please let
> me know.
James S Reid
EDINA National Datacentre
University of Edinburgh
t: +44 (0)131 651 1383
m: 0759 5116988
f: +44 (0)131 650 3308
e: james.reid at ed.ac.uk
Education is a method whereby one acquires a higher grade of prejudices.
- Laurence J. Peter
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
More information about the Discuss