[OSGeo-Discuss] Liberal licensing of Project Overviews in LiveDVD, do we want this?

Volker Mische volker.mische at gmail.com
Thu Jun 30 01:22:23 PDT 2011

On 06/30/2011 02:29 AM, Simon Cropper wrote:
> Hi Guys,
> Cameron has just posted the new licensing details for the LiveDVD.
> I presume if you actually opened my post that you may be concerned with
> how Project Overviews may be used.
> If you have any opinions on this matter PLEASE speak up -- don't just
> sit in the background as *Cameron will take the lack of any responses as
> an implicit YES to his proposal*.
> Personally I have a problem with Project Overviews, or any technical
> documentation for that matter, being locked up in
> Commercial-in-Confidence derivatives. I think Project Overviews, which
> can be legitimately be included 'as is' in a proposal or design
> document, shouldn't need to be reworked. To me the reworked document,
> which needs to include your name as original author, implies some sort
> of collaboration has occurred when none has occurred. Yes, reworked
> documents do look better but contribute nothing the the broader
> CC/FOSS/OSGeo community.
> But this is my opinion. If you have one - for or against - *especially
> those people that have authored the Project Overviews*, SPEAK UP!

Hi Simon,

what you describe are implications of Open Source. Why is it an issue
for documentation but not for source code?


More information about the Discuss mailing list