[OSGeo-Discuss] OGC compliance of WMS client

Sebastian Goerke goerke at lat-lon.de
Mon Apr 22 02:35:13 PDT 2013


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

yes Andrea, but in my opinion it is not forbidden to have additional
support for the other alternative. You have to implement the case
sensitive KVP but it is not forbidden to implement the other additionally.

Regards

Sebastian

- -- 
l a t / l o n  GmbH
Aennchenstrasse 19               53177 Bonn, Germany
phone ++49 +228 18496-0          fax ++49 +228 18496-29
http://www.lat-lon.de            http://www.deegree.org


Am 22.04.2013 11:25, schrieb Andrea Aime:
> 2013/4/22 Marco Lechner - FOSSGIS e.V. <marco.lechner at fossgis.de>
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> is a WMS-Client using "REQUEST=getcapabilities" instead of 
>> "REQUEST=GetCapabilities" still in compliance with OGC standard 
>> (VERSION1.1.1 as well as 1.3.0)? I don't think so, but I'm
>> unsure.
>> 
>> 
> My understanding is that it's not. All OGC KVP protocols are based
> on the following (stated in the common ows spec): "the key is case
> insensitive, the value is case sensitive"
> 
> So, something like ReQueSt=GetCapabilities is valid, but 
> request=getcapabilities is not
> 
> Cheers Andrea -- == GeoServer training in Milan, 6th & 7th June
> 2013!  Visit http://geoserver.geo-solutions.it for more
> information. ==
> 
> Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf Technical Lead
> 
> GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 55054  Massarosa
> (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39
> 339 8844549
> 
> http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing
> list Discuss at lists.osgeo.org 
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlF1BFAACgkQq1hDh4aJykL7NACgo9QVxQUqlHe8p+SgGZC2QAVL
cAwAoIDemfjwpKnXaAiyaf7OQSda8CN2
=s/wV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Discuss mailing list