[OSGeo-Discuss] Gender bias in nominations
Jeff McKenna
jmckenna at gatewaygeomatics.com
Thu Jul 24 15:57:17 PDT 2014
Thank you everyone for responding (María, Jo, Anne, Madi, Andrea, mpg,
Cameron, and Regina). I agree that the OSGeo community is always
welcoming, and thank you for confirming that there is no issue with the
election/nomination process. It is sometimes hard when I receive direct
messages with concerns and thank you for helping me handle it.
-jeff
On 2014-07-24, 7:41 PM, Paragon Corporation wrote:
> I agree with Jo and Maria. I've always felt welcome in OSGeo primarily
> because I share many interests and philosophies with many of you. I
> think gender quotas will in long run do more damage than good. I'd hate
> to think people think I am where I am because of my gender or that
> people let me get away with stuff just because of my gender.
>
> People should be judged on merit and interest primarily and we should
> focus more on global expansion, education, and activity funding and the
> rest will fall into place.
>
> Thanks,
> Regina Obe
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* discuss-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
> [mailto:discuss-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] *On Behalf Of *Jo Cook
> *Sent:* Thursday, July 24, 2014 10:59 AM
> *To:* María Arias de Reyna
> *Cc:* osgeo
> *Subject:* Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Gender bias in nominations
>
> I totally agree with Maria. As a female member of OSGeo I don't really
> feel that my gender matters in the slightest. I'm far more concerned
> about a bias towards people from the US or Northern/Western Europe if we
> are trying to be truly global.
>
> Jo
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 3:55 PM, María Arias de Reyna
> <delawen+osgeo at gmail.com <mailto:delawen+osgeo at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Jeff McKenna
> <jmckenna at gatewaygeomatics.com
> <mailto:jmckenna at gatewaygeomatics.com>> wrote:
>
> It has been reported to me directly that there are not enough female
> nominations for Charter members. I just want to bring this to the
> attention of the whole community.
>
> Thanks all,
>
> -jeff
>
>
> Agreed.
>
> On the other hand, no one should be nominated just because of their
> gender. In the long run, it doesn't help increasing female numbers.
> (It won't be the first time someone thinks I am where I am just
> because I am female and not because I worked hard.)
>
> I'm sorry if I am bothering someone, but I am very picky with all
> this stuff. It is the eternal discussion about not having enough
> female in tech organizations. If we want to have more female on
> OsGeo, we should go to school now to have them in OsGeo in a few
> years :)
>
> Until then, does it really matter? Are we doing things different? I
> know it looks very cool to have half and half but, is it really
> important?
>
> Regards,
> María.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Discuss at lists.osgeo.org>
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>
>
>
> --
> ***Jo Cook*
> Astun Technology Ltd, The Coach House, 17 West Street, Epsom, Surrey,
> KT18 7RL, UK
> t:+44 7930 524 155
> iShare - Data integration and publishing platform
> <http://www.isharemaps.com/>
>
> *****************************************
>
> Company registration no. 5410695. Registered in England and Wales.
> Registered office: 120 Manor Green Road, Epsom, Surrey, KT19 8LN VAT no.
> 864201149.
>
>
>
More information about the Discuss
mailing list