[OSGeo-Discuss] Proposed process for selecting OSGeo charter members
shfeldman at gmail.com
Fri Jun 27 01:10:58 PDT 2014
Possible reasons for change:
On 26 Jun 2014, at 17:21, Michael P. Gerlek <mpg at flaxen.com> wrote:
> Correct: “membership”, by design at the original founding meeting, was designed not to confer ANY rights or distinguishing properties except for the ability to vote for board members.
> While the election process is pretty messy right now, I view that as a solvable problem: I’m still at a loss to understand why we’d want to change anything more than that.
> On Jun 26, 2014, at 2:58 AM, Steven Feldman <shfeldman at gmail.com> wrote:
>> If I have understood this procedure correctly:
>> The board is voted for by the Charter Members, new Charter Members are proposed and voted for by the existing Charter Members, there may be a limit placed on the number of new Charter Members set by the board.
>> Membership of OSGeo does not seem to confer any rights on the member.
>> Do we need to review our foundation docs to find a more inclusive procedure?
>> Steven Feldman
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Discuss