[OSGeo-Discuss] [Ica-osgeo-labs] Do you remember this?

Tue Dec 22 12:08:09 PST 2015

Hi Carl,

Thank you for your guidance on consensus building and i have taken inspiration from your words. As i told in my email  dated 10th May 2015 [1]  " I now leave this in the safe hands of our OGC colleagues to guide the process forward and i request everyone to work together step by step for this. It is important to be patient , listen to all viewpoints and slowly build consensus. I hope all stakeholders will work together in the common objective of Open Standards in LiDAR for the benefit of the wider geo community."

So i am hopeful that OGC will do the needful. In fact, i think it is OGC (not OSGeo) who should be working on this.

Happy holidays and New Year wishes,

Suchith

[1] http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/2015-May/014211.html

________________________________
From: Carl Reed [carl.n.reed at gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 7:27 PM
To: Suchith Anand
Cc: ica-osgeo-labs at lists.osgeo.org; discuss at lists.osgeo.org; ssimmons at opengeospatial.org
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Ica-osgeo-labs] Do you remember this?

All -

The OGC has a formal Principals of Conduct Policy. I wrote and maintained the policy with the agreement and approval of the OGC membership.

http://www.opengeospatial.org/ogc/policies/conduct

This policy was initially based on the IETF conduct policy.

Please read sections 3.a and 3.b as they have to do with how OGC members interact with one another as well as with the broader community.

So before "stirring the pot" on the LiDAR  topic again, consider the Conduct policy as guidance on consensus building.

Happy Holidays

Carl

On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Suchith Anand <Suchith.Anand at nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:Suchith.Anand at nottingham.ac.uk>> wrote:
Hi Sergio, Micha,

Thank you for bringing this to our attention.

The OSGeo Foundation will respond formally to this in due course as we had initiated this open letter for the need for standards in LiDAR data formats [1], [2]. I request OSGeo Board to add this in the agenda of the next Board meeting and also for the F2F meeting, so we can discuss and plan next steps.

But first we will wait for response from the Open Geospatial Consortium - who as per their website is  committed to making quality open standards for the global geospatial community and have been working on this by setting up a Point Cloud DWG. We have put our trust in OGC in this process , so let us first get the response from OGC. I am ccing Scott Simmons of OGC to get their response.

Best wishes,

Suchith

[1] http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/LIDAR_Format_Letter
[2] http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/2015-May/014222.html

________________________________
From: ica-osgeo-labs [ica-osgeo-labs-bounces at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:ica-osgeo-labs-bounces at lists.osgeo.org>] on behalf of Micha Silver [micha at arava.co.il<mailto:micha at arava.co.il>]
Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 1:55 PM
To: SERGIO ACOSTAYLARA; ica-osgeo-labs at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:ica-osgeo-labs at lists.osgeo.org>; discuss at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:discuss at lists.osgeo.org>
Subject: Re: [Ica-osgeo-labs] [OSGeo-Discuss] Do you remember this?

Here's the continuation:

https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/standards/2015-December/000960.html

On 12/22/2015 03:45 PM, SERGIO ACOSTAYLARA wrote:

I remember discussing this in April: "Open Letter for the need for Open Standards in LiDAR"; now I found this interesting post: http://rapidlasso.com/2015/12/19/the-darc-force-awakens-esri-escalates-lidar-format-war/

Is the empire striking back?

Sergio Acosta y Lara
Departamento de Geomática
Dirección Nacional de Topografía
Ministerio de Transporte y Obras Públicas
URUGUAY

This mail was received via Mail-SeCure System.

_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:Discuss at lists.osgeo.org>
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
This mail was received via Mail-SeCure System.

This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.

Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this
message or in any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the
author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the
University of Nottingham.

This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your
computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email
communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as
permitted by UK legislation.

_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:Discuss at lists.osgeo.org>
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

--
Carl Reed, PhD
Carl Reed and Associates

Mobile: 970-402-0284

This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. 

Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this
message or in any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the
author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the
University of Nottingham.

This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your
computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email
communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as
permitted by UK legislation.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20151222/d101da07/attachment-0002.html>