[OSGeo-Discuss] New incubation procedure

[Jachym Cepicky]

Bart - the thread started as proposal for the new rating system of all
future (and current) OSGeo Projects

čt 5. 3. 2015 v 11:51 odesílatel Bart van den Eijnden <bartvde at osgis.nl>
napsal:

> I don’t think you can put projects that have gone through incubation and
> the projects that still have to incubate at the same level. But that’s my
> opinion only.
>
> Best regards,
> Bart
>
> On 05 Mar 2015, at 11:18, Jachym Cepicky <jachym.cepicky at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Guys,
>
> I think you are trying to find a term for something, I would like to get
> rid of. "OSGeo Project" is, what I would like to achieve for both - today's
> projects and labs together under one hat.
>
> Or anybody thinks completely different?
>
> Just my $.02
> J
>
> čt 5. 3. 2015 v 9:08 odesílatel Suchith Anand <
> Suchith.Anand at nottingham.ac.uk> napsal:
>
>> Yes, i think "Incubator Projects" is an appropriate name for this.
>>
>> Vaclav - Is this ok for you?
>>
>> Suchith
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Bart van den Eijnden [bartvde at osgis.nl]
>> Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2015 7:34 AM
>> To: Vaclav Petras
>> Cc: Suchith Anand; discuss at lists.osgeo.org
>> Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] New incubation procedure
>>
>> I agree Community Projects is a confusing name.
>>
>> What about incubator projects? That’s the term that Apache uses.
>>
>> http://incubator.apache.org
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Bart
>>
>> On 04 Mar 2015, at 23:25, Vaclav Petras <wenzeslaus at gmail.com<mailto:w
>> enzeslaus at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Suchith Anand <
>> Suchith.Anand at nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:Suchith.Anand at nottingham.ac.uk>>
>> wrote:
>> Thanks Jeff.
>>
>> Though we had lots of discussions afterwards and continuing on this , we
>> couldnt find any solution till now. So this might be a good opportunity  to
>> modify the Incubation's "labs" term, to something like "Community Projects"
>> to avoid confusion if that is acceptable to Vaclav, Jachym and others. Many
>> thanks.
>>
>> Well, I'm not particularly fond of "Community Projects" as a name. Even
>> mature FOSS projects are community projects in one way or the other.
>> Unfortunately, I don't have other suggestion.
>>
>> Vaclav
>>
>> Suchith
>>
>> ________________________________________
>> From: discuss-bounces at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:discuss-bounces@
>> lists.osgeo.org> [discuss-bounces at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:discuss-bounces@
>> lists.osgeo.org>] On Behalf Of Jeff McKenna [
>> jmckenna at gatewaygeomatics.com<mailto:jmckenna at gatewaygeomatics.com>]
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 2:26 PM
>> To: discuss at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:discuss at lists.osgeo.org>
>> Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] New incubation procedure
>>
>> (we are approaching 2 full years that this "labs" naming has been an
>> issue and discussed[1])
>>
>> Today, knowing how ingrained the term 'lab' is in the GeoForAll
>> education network, maybe Jachym is correct that it is a good time to
>> modify the Incubation's "labs" term, to something like "Community
>> Projects".
>>
>> [1] http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/ica-osgeo-labs/2013-June/000134.html
>>
>> -jeff
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2015-03-03 3:42 AM, Suchith Anand wrote:
>> > Vaclav,
>> >
>> > Please accept my sincere apologies as it was my mistake that i did not
>> think on this  when we started the ICA-OSGeo Labs initiative (so many
>> things were going on at that time!).
>> >
>> > In universities, we generally use the "Labs" term to refer to
>> infrastructure/people/facilities for a particular subject. For example
>> Botany Lab, Robotics Lab etc. And we wanted to make sure there is a
>> dedicated Open Source Geospatial Lab in universities worldwide  (which
>> includes bringing together people from various disciplines, infrastructure
>> (the physical space) and facilities to make this happen. Also it is easier
>> to make use of the same terminology/structure of "Labs" which is widely
>> used in the university environment to get academics start the initiative in
>> their respective universities (also it is easier for them to convince their
>> higher management on a structure that is known to them than reinvent a new
>> term for this) .
>> >
>> > So it will very helpful for us if you can make use of new
>> "OSGeo-projects" and metioned star (or similar) rating system for the
>> incubation as then there is no confusion in the future. Many thanks for
>> your consideration.
>> >
>> > Best wishes,
>> >
>> > Suchith
>> >
>> > ________________________________________
>> > From: discuss-bounces at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:discuss-bounces@
>> lists.osgeo.org> [discuss-bounces at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:discuss-bounces@
>> lists.osgeo.org>] On Behalf Of Jachym Cepicky [jachym.cepicky at gmail.com<
>> mailto:jachym.cepicky at gmail.com>]
>> > Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 7:27 AM
>> > To: Vaclav Petras
>> > Cc: OSGeo Discussions; incubator at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:
>> incubator at lists.osgeo.org>
>> > Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] New incubation procedure
>> >
>> > Vašku,
>> >
>> > just side note: yes, whith the new "Labs" initiative "OSGeo-Labs" have
>> to change their name.
>> >
>> > My idea would rather be to get rid of current OSGeo- "labs" and
>> "projects" and start with new "OSGeo-projects" and metioned star (or
>> similar) rating system.
>> >
>> > Than for current OSGeo-Labs "OSGeo-project level 1" would make it (or
>> similar)
>> >
>> > Jachym
>> >
>> > po 2. 3. 2015 v 18:33 odesílatel Vaclav Petras <wenzeslaus at gmail.com
>> <mailto:wenzeslaus at gmail.com><mailto:wenzeslaus at gmail.com<mailto:wenz
>> eslaus at gmail.com>>> napsal:
>> >
>> > On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 6:44 AM, Jachym Cepicky <
>> jachym.cepicky at gmail.com<mailto:jachym.cepicky at gmail.com><mailto:
>> jachym.cepicky at gmail.com<mailto:jachym.cepicky at gmail.com>>> wrote:
>> > former "OSGeo Labs" (now it has no name is slowly forgotten in past,
>> but you can find more at http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OSGeo_Labs)
>> >
>> > Hi Jachym,
>> >
>> > do you think that with the renewal you can replace the name "OSGeo
>> Labs" by something else? Now we have also ISPRS-ICA-OSGeo Research and
>> Educational laboratories which might be often shortened to OSGeo Labs,
>> although I prefer OSGeoRELs for writing. The mainling list is
>> ica-osgeo-labs. Put perhaps it is not such an issue since the term "Geo for
>> All" (http://www.geoforall.org/) is now used more and more (well, the
>> linked website as OSGeo Labs in the title element).
>> >
>> > Thanks for taking this into consideration,
>> > Vaclav
>> >
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss mailing list
>> Discuss at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:Discuss at lists.osgeo.org>
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>
>>
>>
>> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
>> and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
>> message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.
>>
>> Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this
>> message or in any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the
>> author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the
>> University of Nottingham.
>>
>> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
>> attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your
>> computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email
>> communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as
>> permitted by UK legislation.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss mailing list
>> Discuss at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:Discuss at lists.osgeo.org>
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss mailing list
>> Discuss at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:Discuss at lists.osgeo.org>
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
>> and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
>> message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.
>>
>> Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this
>> message or in any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the
>> author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the
>> University of Nottingham.
>>
>> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
>> attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your
>> computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email
>> communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as
>> permitted by UK legislation.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss mailing list
>> Discuss at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20150305/08dac87e/attachment-0002.html>