[OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo/LocationTech relationship
Venkatesh Raghavan
raghavan at media.osaka-cu.ac.jp
Sun Nov 15 15:36:17 PST 2015
Jeff,
Many thanks for the great job you are doing in
representing OSGeo with selfless dedication
and for sharing your vision with all of us.
I wish you great fun and safe travel for representing OSGeo at
the GISConf in Moscow [1] that is coming up this weekend.
Best
Venka
[1] http://gisconf.ru/
On 2015/11/16 4:13, Jeff McKenna wrote:
> Hi Cameron,
>
> Thank you for your message. It is very refreshing to speak on this
> topic openly here, as others would rather send me strong private
> messages questioning my sanity, and making threats. I realize that
> many cannot be open on this topic for various reasons.
>
> Let me assure everyone here that I only have one agenda, which is very
> rare these days, and that is to help the OSGeo foundation. I am not
> muzzled by fear or threats, and I will stand up for the OSGeo
> foundation whenever that is required. If by standing up for OSGeo's
> only event all year, FOSS4G, means that I am called "confrontational"
> and "obstructive", then yes you are fully right.
>
> Some may not know this by reading this thread, but I have always been
> a big supporter of LocationTech. I was involved in the beginning of
> LocationTech, involved in the sense of being one of the first
> subscribers to their mailing list, and I even have had many chats
> inside their #locationtech IRC channel, even answering questions from
> new LocationTech community members (technical readers will find it
> interesting to join their IRC channel now on freenode and see the
> first message that is displayed when entering their channel
> "LocationTech: location aware open source software friendly to
> commercialization."). I have followed the development of that
> organization right from the beginning, where they smartly filled a
> void by aiming at the business/commercial side of Open Source
> geospatial (of course, recently they publicly pointed out to me, even
> questioned my sanity, that this was false, I am dreaming, that they
> have always focused instead on the same goals as OSGeo, but readers,
> do a google search for LT and press release, and you will see their
> early visions). Which is why I asked now to hear the vision of
> LocationTech (I was not answered, but someone else pointed to an FAQ
> just made). In any case, no I am not insane, I have always followed
> LocationTech closely.
>
> I do travel to many OSGeo local chapters around the world, constantly,
> and especially to developing areas that are just becoming interested
> in Open Source. In a few days I will again take 3 more planes and
> represent OSGeo at a growing community, again putting life on hold,
> including my health, my money, and my life in general, to go help grow
> the OSGeo community. In this event I can bet that I will speak
> personally to over 100 developers, students, decision makers, and
> researchers; I bet I will personally talk to over 20 businesses
> looking at OSGeo. Those who know me well know that this is why I make
> those trips (I don't go for presentations etc.), it is that face to
> face representation that is so very important, especially in the long
> run.
>
> As the leader of the OSGeo foundation, part of my role is to listen to
> all of the criticism about me; and I realize that the negative words
> you've used about me here for everyone to read, are not the first
> negative ones used at me in years past, nor will they be the last. In
> the big theater room that is the community, there will always be those
> that disagree with me, and I value their opinion as well.
>
> Few in this community see me being so involved behind the scenes. New
> committees, new MoUs, FOSS4G local committees, all just pop up on the
> scene and grow, but few see me behind the scenes helping them form
> initially, and I am ok with that. The core community members in the
> OSGeo foundation know that I support them in every way that I can. I
> often am actively working 2 or even 3 years in advance of a FOSS4G for
> that region, talking with those regions members, getting them to think
> of the possibilities, years before the release of the call for
> hosting. To you and others it looks like I have no innovation, no new
> ideas, I don't work with community leaders, because you don't see me
> working behind the scenes for OSGeo. I am ok with that. You can keep
> going on in thinking this way of me, but I am very proud of what I do
> for OSGeo, what I constantly try to do for OSGeo. Long-time members
> of OSGeo know how I have failed in several proposals to past OSGeo
> boards, and to this day those so-called "failures" are my most proud
> moments. But yes, you can always argue that I am not innovative and
> do not help OSGeo.
>
> I am also not wired to think of "money" first. I follow my heart and
> I try to do the best I can for OSGeo, for the OSGeo foundation,
> always, even if it doesn't make sense for me personally or for my
> career. I do it, for the love of OSGeo. I also realize that it is
> this fact, of how I am wired, that causes conflict with others
> (another example is my father, who constantly says I should go get a
> real job and earn the money I deserve, he sees me struggle financially
> and it drives him crazy). Instead of money, my goal in life is to be
> happy and do well for society. I feel OSGeo and its local chapters
> fits in perfectly with my own personal goals, and I give to OSGeo
> everything I can, every ounce of my being. It is, what I do and what
> I enjoy.
>
> Ok back on track again:
>
> I truly feel that Andrea is doing a great job for LocationTech, always
> has. We have known each other for a long time, since back when I was
> the MapServer users group chair in Ottawa and she first attended. I
> have always treated Andrea and LocationTech with respect.
>
> (before you say how false that is, I will now go into my vision for
> OSGeo)
>
> Vision For OSGeo
> ================
>
> (I should first state that I have called a face to face meeting with
> the OSGeo Board members to work together on topics such as vision and
> the goals of OSGeo, and how to achieve those goals, and that meeting
> will be in January, attended by all members of this new OSGeo board)
>
> "My vision is for OSGeo to be the Open Source geospatial community all
> across the globe, everywhere and anywhere, and have fun doing it. The
> OSGeo community is special, we are unique, we do great things for the
> world, we are open, and we have fun. We accept anyone into our
> community and will give them the spotlight, to help their local
> community and the world share its spatial information. We are OSGeo."
>
> Many have seen me speak about "community" all around the world since
> about 2008, and it is OSGeo's community that is so valued. This vision
> puts our community in that spotlight, and is something that I already
> know that we all follow in our hearts. It is the OSGeo spirit that
> drives us all, that some may not understand, but we can teach them and
> help them share their geospatial information openly, and, show them
> how fun it is.
>
> How to get there
> ================
>
> Focus on Developing Regions
> ---------------------------
>
> Over the next 5 or 10 years, various developing regions ("developing"
> in the sense of in-progress of becoming world leaders in open) across
> the globe, not known globally for their OSGeo chapters yet, will be
> given the OSGeo spotlight. These are important regions of the world,
> extremely active locally but not as well known globally for their
> efforts in Open Source geospatial. Some possible examples are South
> America, South Asia, Russia, China, Middle East, North Africa, and
> India. OSGeo will help give them the world stage for Open Source
> geospatial.
>
> Local Chapters
> --------------
>
> All of the fun happens locally, it is through local chapters that
> OSGeo can grow Open Source geospatial software, learn, share, and have
> fun. We currently have about 30 official chapters, and about 30 in
> formation, but we have so much more work to do to help chapters grow
> in other communities. Let's help them! :)
>
> Projects
> --------
>
> OSGeo projects and those in incubation are very stable and have
> vibrant communities. OSGeo must help these projects grow, and also
> help incoming projects find a home in our community. We must be
> accepting to changing trends and styles in the global industry.
>
> Charter Members
> ---------------
>
> OSGeo charter members will drive the formation of the Open Source
> geospatial community.
>
> Diversity
> ---------
>
> OSGeo must from now on have 50% women on its Board of Directors. This
> year's board has the first women ever on its board, but for 2016/2017
> and beyond, women will again be strongly represented at the board
> level of the OSGeo foundation. This will help provide strong
> leadership from OSGeo throughout the world.
>
> Education and Training
> ----------------------
>
> OSGeo will continue to spread Open Source geospatial to students and
> educators around the world, through the GeoForAll initiative. Focus
> will also change from post-secondary institutions to
> secondary/high-school, getting the young minds excited and interested
> in sharing and being open.
>
> Professional Service Providers
> ------------------------------
>
> OSGeo will begin to focus on its service providers, and give them the
> spotlight they deserve, for choosing to operate their business around
> OSGeo projects. Focus will not only be placed on the larger
> businesses, but for the first time ever, small businesses will be
> given the spotlight from OSGeo.
>
> (in my travels, I estimate that 90% of OSGeo's service providers have
> <10 employees, yet we are not giving these businesses any spotlight)
>
> FOSS4G
> ------
>
> OSGeo's hugely successful yearly event, the global FOSS4G, will
> continue to travel around the world each year. The goal of OSGeo's
> global FOSS4G event over the next 5 to 10 years will be to expand to
> new areas, plant the OSGeo seed locally, learn, share, and have fun.
> The goal will be to share this passion as much as possible, by having
> low-cost FOSS4G events. Regional FOSS4G events will satisfy local
> needs, in however the local chapters desire.
>
> Code Sprints
> ------------
>
> OSGeo will actively promote its ability to support all code sprints of
> any size, no matter if there is only one project being enhanced.
>
> Working with other organizations
> --------------------------------
>
> Working closely with other organizations will continue to be important
> for OSGeo. MoUs with organizations encourage communication, and
> usually have the 2 leaders of the parties sit down face to face once a
> year and talk (which is really priceless in the long-term for the
> commmunity) and review the agreement. Admittedly these agreements are
> not liked by the business-types, for not offering any firm details up
> front (like financial benefits), but in the long term these agreements
> help change opinions, give momentum to both parties, and end up
> creating jobs in the industry.
>
> Standards
> ---------
>
> Standards in geospatial software and data will continue to be one of
> the core parts of every OSGeo project.
>
> Financial Focus
> ---------------
>
> OSGeo has never been about generating revenue. OSGeo is and will be
> about being the Open Source geospatial community, sharing, learning,
> and having fun. OSGeo will continue to be lean, earning enough
> funding to help its annual FOSS4G and other events, maintain OSGeo's
> infrastructure, and other critical needs. The OSGeo foundation will
> continue to be volunteer driven.
>
> Discussion
> ==========
>
> In terms of what I would do to foster working with LocationTech, I
> would work with Andrea directly to develop an MoU agreement draft, and
> then take that draft to each of our Boards. To formalize this
> agreement, I would call for a "Summit" to be held around March of this
> year between the LocationTech Steering Committee members, and the
> OSGeo Board of Directors. This would be a one day meeting, in person,
> and not related to any other existing event (not added to an existing
> program/event). This would allow the OSGeo Board to meet in January,
> establish their goals, and then to sit down prepared with LocationTech
> Steering Committee in March.
>
> I do feel that the LocationTech/OSGeo relationship needs to be
> examined slowly, and this is why I made a stand here this/last week.
> I apologize to Andrea if I have offended her, or disrespected her in
> any way.
>
> About the above vision, I am aware that this was likely asked of me
> now, so that some can point out faults in my thinking, how I am wrong
> etc. That is ok, I accept that, and I also accept that I most likely
> made mistakes in writing this vision today, and I am sure the other
> OSGeo board members will help clarify this in January. I feel the
> process of creating a vision, and following through with that, should
> involve each and every OSGeo member, so I feel that I have nothing to
> hide and everything to gain.
>
> I would like to thank everyone, for again, being you, sharing the
> OSGeo passion, doing what you can, whether it is by teaching, writing,
> developing code, managing a business, learning something new, or just
> following along, your help and smile is what gets me through these
> challenging times.
>
> I would also like to deeply thank those who reached out to me this
> week, during this hard time on me, I will tell you that twice I was
> brought to tears sitting at my computer here reading the small thanks
> for representing them, sent from some far away country by a local
> leader. I do this for you all.
>
> Yours,
>
> -jeff
>
>
More information about the Discuss
mailing list