[OSGeo-Discuss] Small, black & white OSGeo badge for project websites

[Jody Garnett]

I see some discussion on twitter (thanks for kicking that off Andreas):

- https://svn.osgeo.org/osgeo/marketing/logo/svg/ (need to be updated to
gold, silver, bronze)
- https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Seal_contest#Submission_2
- shields style badges:
https://img.shields.io/badge/OSGeo-Project-brightgreen.svg
- shields style badges with compass (similar to
https://www.w3.org/QA/Tools/Icons )

Things waiting on this:

1) meet the osgeo logo requirement for open layers
2) blog post for osgeo 2016 sponsorship program
3) OSGeo Incubation / "Technology" branding

I am sorry this is a real "bike shed" problem.


--
Jody Garnett

On 11 February 2016 at 10:54, Jody Garnett <jody.garnett at gmail.com> wrote:

> related: we have an open email thread on sponsorship badges (bronze,
> silver, gold).
>
> I do like the user-focused open layers site (http://openlayers.org) - a
> small logo would be appropriate in the footer (where the minimal project
> details are provided).
>
> Would it be possible to use the small logo there, and keep the normal
> OSGeo project logo on the project github README
> <https://github.com/openlayers/ol3> which is more developer/project
> focused.
>
> --
> Jody Garnett
>
> On 11 February 2016 at 09:55, Andreas Hocevar <andreas.hocevar at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hey,
>>
>> recently, the OpenLayers project was asked to add an OSGeo badge to
>> the website [1]. Becaue the website is strongly user focused, we
>> consider the existing badge versions too big and colorful. So what the
>> OpenLayers project is asking for is a small and black & white badge. I
>> think this will also benefit other projects.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Andreas.
>>
>>
>> [1] https://github.com/openlayers/ol3/issues/4760
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss mailing list
>> Discuss at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20160223/899339b4/attachment-0002.html>