[OSGeo-Discuss] Is it possible for properitery GIS vendor to market thier properitery product as Open ?

[Luí­s Moreira de Sousa]

Hi there Dirk,

About 5 or 6 years ago a few Green MEPs created the European Parliament Free Source Users Group. They even had a website, but somehow it faded off. I am trying to track down those MEPs and take it from there.

Naturally, anyone can contact their MEPs to identify sensibilities to the subject. I believe an initiative like this is far more effective through the European Parliament.

Regards.
--
Luís Moreira de Sousa
Im Grund 6
CH-8600 Dübendorf
Switzerland

Phone: +41 (0)79 812 62 65
Email: luis.de.sousa at protonmail.ch
URL: https://sites.google.com/site/luismoreiradesousa

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Is it possible for properitery GIS vendor to market thier properitery product as Open ?
Local Time: April 12, 2017 5:57 PM
UTC Time: April 12, 2017 3:57 PM
From: dirk.frigne at geosparc.com
To: discuss at lists.osgeo.org

Dear Luïs,

I fully agree!
How could we approach this for open source software?

(sorry for my late reaction, just returned from a longer holiday break ...)

Dirk.

On 23-03-17 09:30, Luí­s Moreira de Sousa wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> In all countries of the OECD marketing practices are regulated in one
> way or another. For instance, if I sell ear rings made out of lead I can
> not claim they are made of silver. In some cases this sort of
> distinction is not easy, as is the case with "open source" or "open".
>
> In the European Union various mechanisms have been put in place for
> similar situations, such as the Protected Designation of Origin (PDO)
> [0] to label goods produced in specific regions (think of Port,
> Champagne, Scotch) or the Traditional Specialities Guaranteed (TSG) [1]
> to differentiate products crafted by traditional processes.
>
> So far, organisations like the OSGeo or the FSF have focused on
> labelling projects that meet particular criteria in open source, but
> have not - and can not - prevent others from misusing the concept. This
> thread shows that this is a new path the community must trail.
>
> I believe we need a regulatory framework for "open source" labelling;
> something like the EU regulation 1169/2011 [2] for organic farming. It
> not only sets the criteria for farmers to label their products, as it
> actively prevents others from falsely claiming to that criteria.
>
> Regards.
>
> [0]
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geographical_indications_and_traditional_specialities_in_the_European_Union#Protected_designation_of_origin_.28PDO.29
>
> [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geographical_indications_and_traditional_specialities_in_the_European_Union#Traditional_specialities_guaranteed_.28TSG.29
>
>
> [2]
> https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/organic/organic-farming/what-is-organic-farming/organic-certification_en
>
> --
> Luís Moreira de Sousa
> Im Grund 6
> CH-8600 Dübendorf
> Switzerland
>
> Phone: +41 (0)79 812 62 65
> Email: luis.de.sousa at protonmail.ch <mailto:luis.de.sousa at protonmail.ch>
> URL: https://sites.google.com/site/luismoreiradesousa
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20170415/9f103be7/attachment-0002.html>