[OSGeo-Discuss] regarding Standards on the beta website

[Jody Garnett]

For the beta website we all have the same permissions, when this goes live
I hope we can cut this down :)

Many of the standards did not make sense to me, but made sense to the
geoserver-dev team (for example I had forgotten about web context service
as implemented by deegree).

We should also have non OGC standards, like GeoTIFF and GeoJSON.



--
Jody Garnett

On 22 August 2017 at 10:07, Jeff McKenna <jmckenna at gatewaygeomatics.com>
wrote:

> Many of these don't make any sense to me, if you ask me my opinion.  We
> should be using the list of OGC standards and entering them into wordpress,
> and not allowing editors to edit/add new non-standards.  But that is all my
> own opinion :)  Then we can link to these standards.  As of now anyone can
> create a 'standard' and post it on the beta site, seems very odd to me.
>
> Is my opinion here too strong?  For now I chose just to edit the
> descriptions for all of these 'standards', valid or not.
>
> What do you prefer?
>
> -jeff
>
>
>
> On 2017-08-22 1:59 PM, Jody Garnett wrote:
>
>> Thanks jeff, I just noticed that work had been done in the GeoServer
>> meeting :) We also spotted one standard "OGC" which does not make sense.
>>
>> Do you think it is worthwhile linking to these standards?
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jody Garnett
>>
>> On 22 August 2017 at 09:42, Jeff McKenna <jmckenna at gatewaygeomatics.com
>> <mailto:jmckenna at gatewaygeomatics.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     Since we have so many website 'editors' (currently 84), please if
>>     you do create a new "standard" (double-quote use is on purpose, as
>>     many of these are not actual standards) when you are editing your
>>     project page, please let me know and I will edit the new standard
>>     and add a description - I have just went through all of these
>>     "standards" and set descriptions for each of the 27 "standards".
>>  For example:
>>
>>        (WPS)
>>
>>          will now appear on the project pages as:
>>
>>         Web Processing Service (WPS)
>>
>>     This consistency makes it much easier to read for new users to our
>> site.
>>
>>     thanks all!
>>
>>     -jeff
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20170822/6cba6c53/attachment.html>