[OSGeo-Discuss] Wiki: InfrastructurePreferencesStatusQuo - call for update

[Jody Garnett]

That is a *great* talk, and shows a lot of areas where we can improve.

There has been a consistent call for "incubation" to continue to hold
projects accountable to OSGeo standards. I have resisted these calls as I
view incubation as an outreach activity - part of our mission to promote
open/transparent software development.

Still that is great to have an external review; is that review public?

--
Jody Garnett

On 21 March 2017 at 01:18, Venkatesh Raghavan <raghavan at media.osaka-cu.ac.jp
> wrote:

> Maxi also made an excelling presentation on related topic
> at FOSS4G-Asia 2017. The presentation is available at
>
> http://www.slideshare.net/cannata/massimiliano-cannata-keyno
> te-foss4gasia-2017
>
> Best
>
> Venka
>
> On 2017/03/20 22:08, Jeff McKenna wrote:
>
>> Actually Maxi and I did a recent thorough research into OSGeo project use
>> of infrastructure, by each project, and it was published as a paper (or
>> soon to be).  In the short term I know Maxi has submitted it as a talk for
>> FOSS4G-Europe.  It's good to take a step back and review old processes.
>> Actually we hope that that was a start of a regular OSGeo project 'health
>> checkup', which obviously is very needed.  For example, it was quite
>> shocking how many current OSGeo projects are functioning without any
>> regular Project Steering Committee meetings, or even a visible Project
>> Steering Committee.  I am sure Maxi will be sharing those results at
>> FOSS4G-E.
>>
>> -jeff
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20170321/3a2c77af/attachment-0002.html>