[OSGeo-Discuss] withdrawal from Board election
Marc Vloemans
marcvloemans1 at gmail.com
Sun Oct 22 11:05:35 PDT 2017
+++1
Kind regards,
Marc Vloemans
> Op 22 okt. 2017 om 18:33 heeft seven <seven at arnulf.us> het volgende geschreven:
>
> After reading latest posts I agree that canceling the elections might open Pandora's box (which is not going to happen because we are all grown up and work towards the same goal, right?)
>
> Honestly, having Jeff retrospectively withdrawing his resignation and accepting the election and sit on the board will make him (and us all) look really silly. I already regret to have voiced my opinion at all.
>
> Vasile, Board, you have my fullest compassion.
>
> http://arnulf.us
> Mind your business
>
> -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------
> Von: nik at nikosalexandris.net
> Datum: 22.10.17 18:18 (GMT+01:00)
> An: vasile at geo-spatial.org
> Cc: discuss at lists.osgeo.org
> Betreff: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] withdrawal from Board election
>
> Dear Vasile,
>
> for what is worth, from my short experience as a CRO for GRASS' PSC elections last year, and I mean my readings on and off in trying to be useful for the process,
>
> I think it is not useful to cancel running elections. Nor it is to accept any withdrawal during the process.
>
> The candidacies, the process and the result should be protected from any such actions. Else, it is like openning a small Pandora's box and any similar difficulty could eventually cancel the elections.
>
> Please, let the process finish, don't rush. Give time for second thoughts to everyone. After the elections, life will go on somehow as Even sketched it very well.
>
> Nikos
>
> À Dimanche 22 octobre 2017, Vasile Craciunescu a écrit :
> > Barry,
> >
> > I fully agree with you that a complete restart is the fairest way to go.
> > However, people are getting really tired with this subject and some
> > already unsubscribe from this mailing list. Also, not sure if this
> > should be my call or the board should formally decide on this. Probably
> > should be me, as four of the board are standing for reelection. I know
> > that most of you are irritated by the amount of emails that circulate
> > this days on the mailing list but I would like to hear more opinions on
> > this subject before taking a decision.
> >
> > Best,
> > Vasile
> > CRO 2017
> >
> >
> > On 10/22/17 4:33 PM, Barry Rowlingson wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > My proposal to the Board and the OSGeo charter members is to leave the
> > > list as it is and make sure that the people that did not vote yet are
> > > aware of Jeff's request to withdraw from the Board elections.
> > >
> > >
> > > No, this is completely off. If a candidate withdraws during an election,
> > > you should declare the current ballot void and start a new one without
> > > the withdrawn candidate.
> > > Leaving the ballot running, but telling people who have not voted yet
> > > that one candidate has withdrawn is *unfair* to those who already voted.
> > >
> > > I would hope that running a ballot is low-enough cost that this doesn't
> > > have a cost impact, unlike a paper election!
> > >
> > > If Jeff had been elected to the board and then resigned the day after
> > > the election then I assume there's regulations for having new
> > > by-elections for vacant seats, but this situation is not the same.
> > >
> > > Barry
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I can
> > > insert the information in the reminder mail that I'm planing to submit
> > > tonight/Monday morning.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Vasile
> > > CRO 2017
> > >
> > >
> > > [1] http://www.geo-spatial.org/osgeo/bucuresti2017
> > > <http://www.geo-spatial.org/osgeo/bucuresti2017>
> > >
> > >
> > > On 10/21/17 3:34 PM, Jeff McKenna wrote:
> > > > Dear CRO,
> > > >
> > > > Please accept my withdrawal from the Board election. I am sorry to
> > > > cause all of the problems so clearly explained by so many here
> > > publicly
> > > > this election.
> > > >
> > > > I wish to take the time now to thank all of the candidates for
> > > > volunteering their time for the OSGeo community.
> > > >
> > > > Yours,
> > > >
> > > > -Jeff McKenna
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Discuss mailing list
> > > > Discuss at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Discuss at lists.osgeo.org>
> > > > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> > > <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Discuss mailing list
> > > Discuss at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Discuss at lists.osgeo.org>
> > > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> > > <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Vasile Crăciunescu
> > geo-spatial.org: An elegant place for sharing geoKnowledge & geoData
> > http://www.geo-spatial.org
> > http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/geo-spatial
> > _______________________________________________
> > Discuss mailing list
> > Discuss at lists.osgeo.org
> > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discus
>
> --
> Envoyé depuis mon Jolla
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20171022/b37d7562/attachment.html>
More information about the Discuss
mailing list