[OSGeo-Discuss] Code of Conduct... followup to avoid lobbies

[Ian Turton]

Plus if someone can be bothered to go to the lengths required to form a
lobby they are probably more likely to interact with the foundation than
the majority of our membership, which is probably a good thing and
certainly one I'm prepared to risk.

Ian

On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 at 10:27, Hans Gregers Hedegaard Petersen <
gregers at septima.dk> wrote:

> Hi Luigi,
>
> Yes, I have a trust in our members, and also trust that they would speak
> up their concerns if they saw a problem (of any kind) with a nomination.
>
> Best,
>
> Greg
>
>
> On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 at 11:18, Luigi Pirelli <luipir at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> let me rephrase, your suggestion is that, with the actual rule, in case
>> of "lobby", other member should rise the exception for a specified
>> candidate?
>> Luigi Pirelli
>>
>>
>> **************************************************************************************************
>> * LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/luigipirelli
>> * Stackexchange: http://gis.stackexchange.com/users/19667/luigi-pirelli
>> * GitHub: https://github.com/luipir
>> * Mastering QGIS 2nd Edition:
>> *
>> https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/mastering-qgis-second-edition
>> * Hire me: http://goo.gl/BYRQKg
>>
>> **************************************************************************************************
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss



-- 
Ian Turton
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20181218/8b055563/attachment.html>