[OSGeo-Discuss] ESA-NASA WebWorldWind
bradh at frogmouth.net
bradh at frogmouth.net
Wed Feb 14 14:18:11 PST 2018
Just so we’re clear – the geopackage stuff in WWSK is a fork of (i.e. copy from) the community modules in geotools and geoserver. For example, see https://github.com/NASAWorldWind/WorldWindServerKit/blob/develop/worldwind-gs-geopkg/src/test/java/gov/nasa/worldwind/gs/geopkg/GeoPackageGetMapOutputFormatTest.java
Some changes have been made (including rebranding the Java namespaces). Clearly the changes can’t just be taken from WWSK, as noted in the OSGeo links in Ian’s email.
I just hadn’t seen any communication or PRs, and wondered if that was the intent. I’m a bit surprised by the wording in your email though – if you have contributions, then why not just propose them like other contributors do?
Brad
From: Hogan, Patrick (ARC-PX) [mailto:patrick.hogan at nasa.gov]
Sent: Thursday, 15 February 2018 3:21 AM
To: Ian Turton <ijturton at gmail.com>
Cc: bradh at frogmouth.net; OSGeo Discussions <discuss at lists.osgeo.org>
Subject: RE: [OSGeo-Discuss] ESA-NASA WebWorldWind
Our GeoPackage work to facilitate that via GeoServer is extensive and carefully architected. And we’ve discovered some other good things that would certainly advance GeoServer.
<https://github.com/NASAWorldWind/WorldWindServerKit> https://github.com/NASAWorldWind/WorldWindServerKit
NASA is prepared to work with someone close to GeoServer for these features and improvements to be ‘folded-in.’ We are glad to coordinate with a most appropriate person who would take the lead in that effort.
-Patrick
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20180215/0298cd7a/attachment.html>
More information about the Discuss
mailing list