[OSGeo-Discuss] Broken GPG signatures (was: Change in mailing list configuration)

[Sandro Santilli]

I thought I'd mention that the GPG signatures in emails sent to this
list are currently unverifiable due to the email address of the sender
NOT being in the From field. Example:

  From: Jorge Sanz via Discuss <discuss at lists.osgeo.org>
  To: discuss at lists.osgeo.org
  Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Mailing lists to discourse migration
  Message-ID: <4edbc588-9e29-4c51-9b25-520c0112ad36 at osgeo.org>

  [-- Begin signature information --]
  Problem signature from: KeyID 91EB9EC08EC1CAD46631BC5893A8CE9CA5942A46
                 created: Tue 30 Jan 2024 11:08:19 AM CET
  Can't verify due to a missing key or certificate
  [-- End signature information --]

I'm adding mailing list owners as I think they should have the last
word on what the configuration of the list should be.

I for one still think we should re-apply the change that I applied
on Jan 11th [1] after nobody had anything to say about my proposal
of Jan 4th [2]


[1] https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/2024-January/040058.html
[2] https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/2024-January/040048.html

--strk;
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 659 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20240131/65b43507/attachment.sig>