[OSGeo-Discuss] Broken GPG signatures (was: Change in mailing list configuration)

[Javier Jimenez Shaw]

Thanks Sandro for caring about this.

I understand that some people get annoyed if the prefix is removed (not me
personally). That made me compare with google groups:
I am in a google groups mailing list, and the emails "pass" for SPF and
DKIM. This group has a "prefix" added by the mailing list automatically.
What are they doing differently that we cannot?

About the GPG signature, I do not know. Nobody in my google group uses it.
Maybe Jorge Sanz has some experience.

Cheers,
Javier

On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 at 18:33, Sandro Santilli via Discuss <
discuss at lists.osgeo.org> wrote:

> I thought I'd mention that the GPG signatures in emails sent to this
> list are currently unverifiable due to the email address of the sender
> NOT being in the From field. Example:
>
>   From: Jorge Sanz via Discuss <discuss at lists.osgeo.org>
>   To: discuss at lists.osgeo.org
>   Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Mailing lists to discourse migration
>   Message-ID: <4edbc588-9e29-4c51-9b25-520c0112ad36 at osgeo.org>
>
>   [-- Begin signature information --]
>   Problem signature from: KeyID 91EB9EC08EC1CAD46631BC5893A8CE9CA5942A46
>                  created: Tue 30 Jan 2024 11:08:19 AM CET
>   Can't verify due to a missing key or certificate
>   [-- End signature information --]
>
> I'm adding mailing list owners as I think they should have the last
> word on what the configuration of the list should be.
>
> I for one still think we should re-apply the change that I applied
> on Jan 11th [1] after nobody had anything to say about my proposal
> of Jan 4th [2]
>
>
> [1] https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/2024-January/040058.html
> [2] https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/2024-January/040048.html
>
> --strk;
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20240131/e3c1792b/attachment.htm>