[fdo-internals] RFC 3: PostGIS provider
mateusz at loskot.net
Thu Apr 26 13:48:11 EDT 2007
Frank Warmerdam wrote:
> Jason Birch wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> Can you please have a look at and comment on RFC3?
> I have no problem with this.
>> I can't remember if we agreed that it could be added to SVN & Trac (new
>> component) ahead of acceptance of the RFC. We'd be grateful if it could
>> :) At this point we are at risk of losing bug reports in initial
> I have taken the liberty of adding a "PostGIS Provider" category in the FDO
> Trac with mloskot as the default assignee
That's cool, thanks!
> and I would encourage using this
> for bugs, even in advance of it's formal adoption.
I agree, that seems to be a very good approach.
> Since the code is
> already under subversion at refractions, I think we can wait for migration till it
> is adopted, though it bothers me that we will lose all the history.
Honestly, I'd prefer to start using Trac with the code inside the FDO
SVN, otherwise it may take too much time to sync those separated places.
More information about the fdo-internals