[fdo-internals] New RFC posted

[Thomas Knoell]

Hi Jason

I will see what I can do. I am just leaving for my vacation and have to get back to you on this next week (although being on vacation, I'll still try to answer mails). I hope it can wait until then. 

Thanks

  Thomas

--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


----- Original Message -----
From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org <fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org>
To: FDO Internals Mail List <fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org>
Sent: Fri Aug 03 18:06:32 2007
Subject: RE: [fdo-internals] New RFC posted

Could you maybe outline those issues?  
 
It would be helpful if we could all have an idea of what is coming up and see how it fits together, rather than being fed RFCs / problems piecemeal.
 
I was able to read the PDF version, btw, and it answers most of my questions.  I still don't know what the difference between Mod and Remainder is though :)
 
A couple functions raise questions for me
 
- the date functions have month math operators, but none for other units?
- is there a common way of specifying code pages that all providers should understand?  I don't know much about this area.
 
Jason

  _____  

From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Knoell
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 14:53
To: fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [fdo-internals] New RFC posted



For the geometry functions, there are different issues to address which we thought is better suited to be outlined separately.

Thanks

  Thomas

--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


----- Original Message -----
From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org <fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org>
To: FDO Internals Mail List <fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org>
Sent: Fri Aug 03 17:45:04 2007
Subject: RE: [fdo-internals] New RFC posted

Is there any specific reason for that ?



 Haris



From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Knoell
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 11:40 PM
To: fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [fdo-internals] New RFC posted



Spatial functions will be handled separately.

--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


----- Original Message -----
From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org <fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org>
To: FDO Internals Mail List <fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org>
Sent: Fri Aug 03 17:35:42 2007
Subject: RE: [fdo-internals] New RFC posted

I’ve noticed there is no any Spatial Functions. What is a reason for that?



Thank you,

Haris



From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Knoell
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 9:35 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: [fdo-internals] New RFC posted



Hi,



A new RFC (http://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/wiki/FDORfc8) has been posted. The RFC addresses the enhancement of the FDO well known (expression) function list to include additional, commonly used functions.



Please review the RFC. Any comments/suggestions and questions are welcome. All feedback is expected by the end-of-day August 10th 2007. If no changes are required it is my intent to motion that a vote for the acceptance of the RFC be made and subsequently voted on by the PSC.



Thanks



  Thomas







-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/fdo-internals/attachments/20070803/0bad3600/attachment-0001.html