[fdo-internals] New RFC posted

[Jason Birch]

Could you maybe outline those issues?  
 
It would be helpful if we could all have an idea of what is coming up
and see how it fits together, rather than being fed RFCs / problems
piecemeal.
 
I was able to read the PDF version, btw, and it answers most of my
questions.  I still don't know what the difference between Mod and
Remainder is though :)
 
A couple functions raise questions for me
 
- the date functions have month math operators, but none for other
units?
- is there a common way of specifying code pages that all providers
should understand?  I don't know much about this area.
 
Jason

________________________________

From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Thomas
Knoell
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 14:53
To: fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [fdo-internals] New RFC posted



For the geometry functions, there are different issues to address which
we thought is better suited to be outlined separately.

Thanks

  Thomas

--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


----- Original Message -----
From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
<fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org>
To: FDO Internals Mail List <fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org>
Sent: Fri Aug 03 17:45:04 2007
Subject: RE: [fdo-internals] New RFC posted

Is there any specific reason for that ?



 Haris



From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Thomas
Knoell
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 11:40 PM
To: fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [fdo-internals] New RFC posted



Spatial functions will be handled separately.

--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


----- Original Message -----
From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
<fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org>
To: FDO Internals Mail List <fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org>
Sent: Fri Aug 03 17:35:42 2007
Subject: RE: [fdo-internals] New RFC posted

I've noticed there is no any Spatial Functions. What is a reason for
that?



Thank you,

Haris



From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Thomas
Knoell
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 9:35 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: [fdo-internals] New RFC posted



Hi,



A new RFC (http://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/wiki/FDORfc8) has been posted. The
RFC addresses the enhancement of the FDO well known (expression)
function list to include additional, commonly used functions.



Please review the RFC. Any comments/suggestions and questions are
welcome. All feedback is expected by the end-of-day August 10th 2007. If
no changes are required it is my intent to motion that a vote for the
acceptance of the RFC be made and subsequently voted on by the PSC.



Thanks



  Thomas






-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/fdo-internals/attachments/20070803/a21a1cff/attachment.html