[fdo-internals] subversion branches

Mateusz Loskot mateusz at loskot.net
Thu Feb 22 11:07:40 EST 2007

Frank Warmerdam wrote:
> Mateusz Loskot wrote:
>> Frank Warmerdam wrote:
>>> I would like to propose that the trunk be removed from all the old
>>> repositories and that the 3.2.x branch be removed from the new merged
>>> repository to avoid confusion and possibly misapplied patches in the
>>> future.  I am prepared to do this task if there is agreement.
>> Frank,
>> I use 3.2.x branch of fdocore for my PostGIS provider.
>> I was told to use 3.2.x to be compatible with Map 3D Hammerhead
>> and MapGuide 1.1.x.
>> Here is the exact URL I use:
>> https://svn.osgeo.org/svn/fdocore/branches/3.2.x/
>> Now, what's the difference between the URL above and this new one below?
>> https://svn.osgeo.org/fdo/branches/3.2.x
> Mateusz,
> The url https://svn.osgeo.org/fdo is equivelent to
> https://svn.osgeo.org/svn/fdo.
> The https://svn.osgeo.org/fdo repository is the new merged respository
> being used for FDO 3.3 (in trunk).
> The https://svn.osgeo.org/fdocore is the repository for only the fdo
> core (not including the providers) and is now only intended for use for
> 3.2.x branch and related releases as I understand it.
> Greg - please correct me if I'm wrong.


OK, so I continue working against the 3.2.x branch I've been
using so far.

Thank you for the explanation.
I wasn't tracked the migration/merging process very carefully, so I felt
 a bit lost :-)

Mateusz Loskot

More information about the fdo-internals mailing list