[fdo-internals] subversion branches
greg.boone at autodesk.com
Thu Feb 22 12:08:49 EST 2007
Frank's analysis is correct.
The trunks of the following repositories are no longer used
As for removing the trunks of the subversions listed above, is there any
drawbacks to doing so? I would like feedback on this by other PSC
As well, the 3.2.0 and 3.2.x branches of the newly merged fdo repository
are misleading and no longer required. I am in favour or removing them.
From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Frank
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 10:58 AM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: Re: [fdo-internals] subversion branches
Mateusz Loskot wrote:
> Frank Warmerdam wrote:
>> I would like to propose that the trunk be removed from all the old
>> repositories and that the 3.2.x branch be removed from the new merged
>> repository to avoid confusion and possibly misapplied patches in the
>> future. I am prepared to do this task if there is agreement.
> I use 3.2.x branch of fdocore for my PostGIS provider.
> I was told to use 3.2.x to be compatible with Map 3D Hammerhead
> and MapGuide 1.1.x.
> Here is the exact URL I use:
> Now, what's the difference between the URL above and this new one
The url https://svn.osgeo.org/fdo is equivelent to
The https://svn.osgeo.org/fdo repository is the new merged respository
being used for FDO 3.3 (in trunk).
The https://svn.osgeo.org/fdocore is the repository for only the fdo
core (not including the providers) and is now only intended for use for
3.2.x branch and related releases as I understand it.
Greg - please correct me if I'm wrong.
I set the clouds in motion - turn up | Frank Warmerdam,
warmerdam at pobox.com
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush | President OSGeo,
fdo-internals mailing list
fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
More information about the fdo-internals