[fdo-internals] providers.xml vs. FdoIConnectionInfo

Traian Stanev traian.stanev at autodesk.com
Thu Feb 22 15:50:44 EST 2007


So there is a utility class (FdoProvider), used to get the information
from the wrong place (provider.xml)?

That's funny.

It still means that the FdoIConnectionInfo functions are useless.


Traian


-----Original Message-----
From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Jack Lee
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 3:47 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: RE: [fdo-internals] providers.xml vs. FdoIConnectionInfo

Hi,

provider.xml should not be access directly but there is a class
FdoProvider that you can use to get information similar to
FdoIConnectionInfo which uses provider.xml.

-----Original Message-----
From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Mateusz
Loskot
Sent: February 22, 2007 3:40 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: Re: [fdo-internals] providers.xml vs. FdoIConnectionInfo

Traian Stanev wrote:
> So basically it doesn't matter what the API calls return, since 
> Hammerhead would get the information from providers.xml.

Yes, that's my understanding of how it works, although I've never
seen the Hammerhead code to be sure :-)

And, it seems to stay in contradiction with what Jack said, that
provider.xml should not be used by an application.
Unless, the Hammerhead is not considered as a regular/external
FDO client...

Cheers
-- 
Mateusz Loskot
http://mateusz.loskot.net
_______________________________________________
fdo-internals mailing list
fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals

_______________________________________________
fdo-internals mailing list
fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals




More information about the fdo-internals mailing list