[fdo-internals] 64bit related changes for 3.2.x?

[Frank Warmerdam]

Jack Lee wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> The change looks good.

Greg / Jack,

Excellent, I'll go ahead with incorporating them into 3.2.x branch.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg Boone 
> Sent: February 23, 2007 9:58 AM
> To: FDO Internals Mail List
> Cc: Jack Lee
> Subject: RE: [fdo-internals] 64bit related changes for 3.2.x? 
> 
> I have no problems with this port. The code looks ok.
> 
> Jack, can you also take a look?
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
> [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Frank
> Warmerdam (External)
> Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 11:55 PM
> To: FDO Internals Mail List
> Subject: [fdo-internals] 64bit related changes for 3.2.x? 
> 
> Folks,
> 
> I'm interested in applying the following 3 changesets back to 3.2.x
> branch
> in Fdo/Unmanaged/Src.
> 
>    http://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/changeset/2514
>    http://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/changeset/2513
>    http://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/changeset/2512
> 
> They are all that is required for 64bit support in the FDO core, and I
> think
> they are all small, understandable and safe.   How do folks feel about
> this?
> I realize 64bit support in 3.2.x is not of any substantial priority.
> 
> Best regards,


-- 
---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam, warmerdam at pobox.com
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush    | President OSGeo, http://osgeo.org