[fdo-internals] PSC: Interesting Conundrum

Greg Boone greg.boone at autodesk.com
Tue Jan 16 15:56:38 EST 2007


Why do we you recommend the /fdodev parent directory?

Why not....

/fdo    - Repository
 /trunk
   /fdo
   /thirdparty
   /utilities
   /providers
    /sdf
    /shp
    /...

-----Original Message-----
From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Robert Bray
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 3:11 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: Re: [fdo-internals] PSC: Interesting Conundrum

Ok, so the next step is figuring out what the repository should look 
like. Trying to avoid as much pain as possible I'd like to propose 
something like:

/fdo    - Repository
 /trunk
  /fdodev
   /fdo
   /thirdparty
   /utilities
   /providers
    /sdf
    /shp
    /...
 /branches
  /3.2.x
   /fdodev
    ...
 
With some creative manipulation of the svn dumps and the --parent-dir 
option of the svnadmin load command I think we can restructure things 
without loss of history or anything else. The build scripts will need a 
fair bit of updating however.

Other ideas or suggestions welcome of course.

Bob
_______________________________________________
fdo-internals mailing list
fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals



More information about the fdo-internals mailing list