[fdo-internals] PSC: Interesting Conundrum
Greg Boone
greg.boone at autodesk.com
Tue Jan 16 15:56:38 EST 2007
Why do we you recommend the /fdodev parent directory?
Why not....
/fdo - Repository
/trunk
/fdo
/thirdparty
/utilities
/providers
/sdf
/shp
/...
-----Original Message-----
From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Robert Bray
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 3:11 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: Re: [fdo-internals] PSC: Interesting Conundrum
Ok, so the next step is figuring out what the repository should look
like. Trying to avoid as much pain as possible I'd like to propose
something like:
/fdo - Repository
/trunk
/fdodev
/fdo
/thirdparty
/utilities
/providers
/sdf
/shp
/...
/branches
/3.2.x
/fdodev
...
With some creative manipulation of the svn dumps and the --parent-dir
option of the svnadmin load command I think we can restructure things
without loss of history or anything else. The build scripts will need a
fair bit of updating however.
Other ideas or suggestions welcome of course.
Bob
_______________________________________________
fdo-internals mailing list
fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals
More information about the fdo-internals
mailing list