[fdo-internals] PSC: Interesting Conundrum

[Robert Bray]

You need a single root for branch operations. Otherwise you will have to 
branch each of those folders or have /branches/3.2.x/trunk which is 
kinda weird.

Bob

Greg Boone wrote:
> Why do we you recommend the /fdodev parent directory?
>
> Why not....
>
> /fdo    - Repository
>  /trunk
>    /fdo
>    /thirdparty
>    /utilities
>    /providers
>     /sdf
>     /shp
>     /...
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
> [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Robert Bray
> Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 3:11 PM
> To: FDO Internals Mail List
> Subject: Re: [fdo-internals] PSC: Interesting Conundrum
>
> Ok, so the next step is figuring out what the repository should look 
> like. Trying to avoid as much pain as possible I'd like to propose 
> something like:
>
> /fdo    - Repository
>  /trunk
>   /fdodev
>    /fdo
>    /thirdparty
>    /utilities
>    /providers
>     /sdf
>     /shp
>     /...
>  /branches
>   /3.2.x
>    /fdodev
>     ...
>  
> With some creative manipulation of the svn dumps and the --parent-dir 
> option of the svnadmin load command I think we can restructure things 
> without loss of history or anything else. The build scripts will need a 
> fair bit of updating however.
>
> Other ideas or suggestions welcome of course.
>
> Bob
> _______________________________________________
> fdo-internals mailing list
> fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals
>
> _______________________________________________
> fdo-internals mailing list
> fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals
>
>