[fdo-internals] RFC Reminder

[Greg Boone]

1) In order to remain consistent with the rest of the FDO API

 

enum FdoFunctionClass {

                 FdoFunctionClass_Aggregate,

                 FdoFunctionClass_Conversion,

                 FdoFunctionClass_Custom,

                 FdoFunctionClass_Date,

                 FdoFunctionClass_Intrinsic,

                 FdoFunctionClass_Math,

                 FdoFunctionClass_Numeric,

                 FdoFunctionClass_String,

                 FdoFunctionClass_Unspecified 

}  //  enum FdoFunctionClass

 

Should use the word Type in its naming convention as follows....

 

enum FdoFunctionClassType {

                 FdoFunctionClassType_Aggregate,

                 FdoFunctionClassType_Conversion,

                 FdoFunctionClassType_Custom,

                 FdoFunctionClassType_Date,

                 FdoFunctionClassType_Intrinsic,

                 FdoFunctionClassType_Math,

                 FdoFunctionClassType_Numeric,

                 FdoFunctionClassType_String,

                 FdoFunctionClassType_Unspecified 

}  //  enum FdoFunctionClassType

 

 

NOTE: Subsequent required changes to the other API methods,
documentation, etc, to indicate Type, is omitted for brevity sake. 

 

2) Can you add the required documentation for the public Create
functions explaining the parameters, return types, usage, etc.

 

3) Can you add simple code examples demonstrating how the new methods
will be used?

 

4) Can you add details on how the Managed API will have to be updated to
reflect the proposed changes?

 

Greg

 

From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Thomas
Knoell
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 11:13 AM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: [fdo-internals] RFC Reminder

 

Hi everyone

 

As indicated in an e-mail dated July 17th, FDO RFC 5
(http://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/wiki/FDORfc5) had been posted and is ready
for review. Please complete the review of the RFC and comment on it by
end-of-day Tuesday, July 31st. If no changes are required, it is my
intent to motion that a vote for the acceptance of RFC5 be made and
subsequently voted on by the PSC. 

 

Thanks

 

  Thomas

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/fdo-internals/attachments/20070730/dbf6b28d/attachment-0001.html