[fdo-internals] fdogdal <Bounds> support for 3.2.x

[Greg Boone]

Yes, MG 1.2.0 RC1 is just building off the head revision of the 3.2.x
branch.

Personally, I think stamping a 3.2.2.0 and 3.2.2.1 tag in the various
3.2.x svn repositories would be sufficient to move us to a point where
we could get the necessary provider updates to our clients. I don't
think branching is required.

Greg

-----Original Message-----
From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Frank
Warmerdam (External)
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 3:16 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: Re: [fdo-internals] fdogdal <Bounds> support for 3.2.x

Greg Boone wrote:
> Based on the preliminary feedback, I would recommend that we release a
> 3.2.2.1 version of the GDAL and WMS providers (Those that use the GDAL
> SDK). This would limit the changes required and allow version
> compatibility with the 3.2.2 release shipped with MG 1.2.

Greg,

That sounds like an excellent plan.  I notice there isn't yet a 3.2.2
branch in stuff like the fdogdal provider.  I presume the MapGuide
1.2.0RC1
was just built off the 3.2.x fdo branch.  Is that right?  Are we
planning
on a formal 3.2.2 branch in the old fdo repositories?  Would we also tag
3.2.2.0 and 3.2.2.1 releases?

Best regards,
-- 
---------------------------------------+--------------------------------
------
I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam,
warmerdam at pobox.com
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush    | President OSGeo,
http://osgeo.org

_______________________________________________
fdo-internals mailing list
fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals