[fdo-internals] fdogdal <Bounds> support for 3.2.x

[Greg Boone]

I think we should tag the branch now. I do not foresee any further
changes happening for MG 1.2.

Tom, will you be requiring another build of FDO?

Greg

-----Original Message-----
From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Frank
Warmerdam (External)
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 8:24 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: Re: [fdo-internals] fdogdal <Bounds> support for 3.2.x

Greg Boone wrote:
> Yes, MG 1.2.0 RC1 is just building off the head revision of the 3.2.x
> branch.
> 
> Personally, I think stamping a 3.2.2.0 and 3.2.2.1 tag in the various
> 3.2.x svn repositories would be sufficient to move us to a point where
> we could get the necessary provider updates to our clients. I don't
> think branching is required.

Greg,

OK, will someone (you?) being making 3.2.2.0 tags off the 3.2.x branch
when
MGOS 1.2.0 goes official?  I'll hold my patch till after that.

Best regards,
-- 
---------------------------------------+--------------------------------
------
I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam,
warmerdam at pobox.com
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush    | President OSGeo,
http://osgeo.org

_______________________________________________
fdo-internals mailing list
fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals