[fdo-internals] FDO Incubation Progress Reports
dmorissette at mapgears.com
Wed Mar 14 15:46:51 EDT 2007
While we're dealing with the PSC doc: there are still mentions of
fdo-dev and fdo-psc lists in http://fdo.osgeo.org/psc.html. The document
should probably be fixed to refer to fdo-internals which is the current
Daniel Morissette wrote:
> Thanks for taking the time to address my questions. One last question
> inline below...
> Greg Boone wrote:
>> Daniel Morissette wrote:
>> 3- Project Steering Committee
>> There is a draft PSC document at http://fdo.osgeo.org/psc.html.
>> Apparently the PSC has not been officially formed yet, but from
>> following the mapguide-internals list they seem to operate as a
>> pseudo-PSC already, with motions and votes on the list once in a while,
>> etc. This will be sorted out soon I'm sure.
>> [GB] The PSC has been formed. Refer to
>> [GB] However, so far we have only had a single meeting.
> I could not find any trace of a vote to approve the PSC document. The
> minutes of the first IRC meeting mention that Bob was going to update
> the PSC doc and send a motion for vote on the list (presumably meaning
> fdo-psc list at the time). Unfortunately the fdo-psc list archives seem
> to have been lost when fdo-dev + fdo-psc merged into what is currently
> fdo-internals. I found some fdo-psc emails around that date in my
> personal archives but nothing about a vote to approve the PSC doc.
> I don't want to be a pain about this, just want to make sure that the
> PSC doc that's currently at http://fdo.osgeo.org/psc.html is final and
> has been approved. If that's the case then the [Draft] in the title
> should be removed since that suggests that the doc has not been approved
> yet. Also, the MapGuide PSC doc (http://mapguide.osgeo.org/psc.html) has
> a clear header stating that it has been adopted, the current revision
> number and the last revision date. I think it would be good to have that
> for FDO as well.
More information about the fdo-internals