[fdo-internals] MOTION: Acceptance of updated FDO ConributorAgrements

Robert Bray rbray at robertbray.net
Sun Nov 25 17:45:32 EST 2007

I agree with Frank. For MapGuide we asked all committers to sign an 
agreement. I think we should do the same for FDO. For Autodesk staff, they 
need to be listed on the CCLA and also sign and fax an individual CLA.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Frank Warmerdam" <warmerdam at pobox.com>
To: "FDO Internals Mail List" <fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org>
Cc: "Tyler Mitchell (OSGeo)" <tmitchell at osgeo.org>
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2007 10:05 AM
Subject: Re: [fdo-internals] MOTION: Acceptance of updated FDO 

> Greg Boone wrote:
>> Hi All,
>> Now that the new contributor agreements have been accepted, is there a
>> requirement for all existing contributors to sign the agreement?
> Greg,
> I believe they should.
> I have signed and faxed my individual contributor agreement to Tyler.
> Hopefully Tyler will notify you, as FDO chair, when he receives and
> files contributor agreements for the FDO project.
> I'd suggest we also keep a reasonably prominent list of contributors,
> and developers so we know who is covered by a contribution agreement.
> For instance, commiters should not really be accepting and applying
> code from contributors who haven't signed an agreement yet unless the
> patch is of a trivial size (so as to not be meaningfully copyrightable).
> Best regards,
> -- 
> ---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
> I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam, 
> warmerdam at pobox.com
> light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
> and watch the world go round - Rush    | President OSGeo, http://osgeo.org
> _______________________________________________
> fdo-internals mailing list
> fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals

More information about the fdo-internals mailing list