[fdo-internals] FDO KingOracle and KingMsSqlSpaial Files

[Greg Boone]

On a related note, are we treating the files in the FDO SVN as the
latest and most recent/relevant copy of the King and PostGIS Providers,
thus including them as candidates for the 3.3 build and release cycle?
There has always been some confusion in my mind whether this was the
case or not.

 

Greg

 

 

From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Greg Boone
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 5:07 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: [fdo-internals] FDO KingOracle and KingMsSqlSpaial Files

 

Hi All,

 

I have taken a quick look at the files in the following OSGeo FDO SVN
directories:

 

https://svn.osgeo.org/fdo/trunk/Providers/KingMsSqlSpatial

https://svn.osgeo.org/fdo/trunk/Providers/KingOracle 

 

Not all source files contain the proper GNU LGPL comment blocks at the
top of each file. If there is no objections, I will be updating the
files with the appropriate comment block headers as required. Developers
having source code modifications for these directories will have to
merge any changes as required.

 

Greg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/fdo-internals/attachments/20071015/a9d990df/attachment.html