[fdo-internals] FDO RFC 21 - New Linux Buildsystem Cmake Based

[Greg Boone]

Clarification:

3) How has the build and the resulting FDO binaries been tested and on which platforms has they been tested? What are the output test results?

Additional Question:

6) Where is the build/runtime document that explains how to execute the new build process and validate the result of the build using the FDO unit tests?

-----Original Message-----
From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Greg Boone
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 4:25 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: RE: [fdo-internals] FDO RFC 21 - New Linux Buildsystem Cmake Based

I believe I asked these questions before, but if these new files are submitted

1) Will it modify the existing build process?
2) How will it integrate with the current Windows build process?
3) How has it been tested and on which platforms has it been tested?
4) Who will maintain and support these files and this build process going forward? Someone needs to be tasked with this responsibility.
5) Will we finally get a buildbot setup if we move to this process?

All these questions need to be answered to my satisfaction, and in detail, before I would consider approving this RFC.

Greg

-----Original Message-----
From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Frank Warmerdam (External)
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 3:09 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: Re: [fdo-internals] FDO RFC 21 - New Linux Buildsystem Cmake Based

Jason Birch wrote:
> I think that this was the last of the questions?
>
> Rather than continuing to beat this to death, I would really like to
> see:
>
> - Helio's current (3.4.x) cmake work checked into trunk as an alternate
> build system
> - With the understanding that this is Linux-only (and BSD/MacOS as we
> have time); won't touch Windows solutions, etc at all

Jason,

I think the way forward is to update RFC 21 to handle your proposed
transitional approach, and then call for a vote on it.

At this point I'm moderately supportive of the approach, and will commit
to doing at least some testing of the new build mechanism once it is in
place.

I would like to see the RFC include an action item for someone to write
up a brief introduction to using and updating cmake in the context of
FDO.

Best regards,
--
---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam, warmerdam at pobox.com
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush    | Geospatial Programmer for Rent

_______________________________________________
fdo-internals mailing list
fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals
_______________________________________________
fdo-internals mailing list
fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals