[fdo-internals] Trac Website (was: How does FDO handle invalid fgfgeometries?)

[Jason Birch]

Any further thoughts on this?  Specifically, any outright objections?  If not, I'll start to put together an RFC for this when I have time.

Thanks,
Jason

-----Original Message-----
From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Jason Birch
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2008 09:44
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: [fdo-internals] Trac Website (was: How does FDO handle invalid fgfgeometries?)

(moving to internals)

Frank wrote:
----------------------
I would be supportive of such a direction for FDO.  I'm not sure what you mean about making the Trac front page look nicer though.  Is this about better information organization?  Or about html/css styling type changes?
I'm not super keen on doing fancy css/html stuff for the trac instances.
----------------------

No, I'm happy with the bare look (especially now that you've nuked the ugly red links) though we could certainly use a nice image on the main page and maybe a logo.

Better internal information organization would be necessary as we migrated documents from the main website.  In particular, one thing that is missing from Trac is a sidebar navigation system.  Hectares BC is using a macro called TracNav (yes, I know that we're trying not to use custom stuff in Trac) that would meet this need:

http://www.hectaresbc.org/trac

http://svn.ipd.uka.de/trac/javaparty/wiki/TracNav

Jason