[fdo-internals] MOTION -- RFC42 - Direct ArcSDE Provider
crispin.hoult at 1spatial.com
Wed Dec 9 04:46:24 EST 2009
On protocol - the RFC now has 5x +1 and 2x +0.
Is this enough for me to update the RFC with the voting and set the status
to another status?
Does it go to "Adopted" or is that status reserved until implemented - is
there an "Accepted" status that shows the RFC is OK but the development is
not available yet?
On a similar note, I know Haris has some updates but these should not be
submitted until after the 3.4.1 point release is out as it would introduce a
change in functionality between a RC and a Release. Do you have a timescale
for the 3.4.1 final?
Greg Boone wrote:
> Hi all,
> There were no further comments on RFC 42:
> http://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/wiki/FDORfc42 - Direct ArcSDE Provider.
> I would like to motion a vote to accept this RFC.
> fdo-internals mailing list
> fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/MOTION-RFC42-Direct-ArcSDE-Provider-tp4107281p4138387.html
Sent from the FDO Internals mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the fdo-internals