[fdo-internals] MOTION -- RFC42 - Direct ArcSDE Provider

[Crispin_at_1Spatial]

Greg,

On protocol - the RFC now has 5x +1 and 2x +0.
Is this enough for me to update the RFC with the voting and set the status
to another status?
Does it go to "Adopted" or is that status reserved until implemented - is
there an "Accepted" status that shows the RFC is OK but the development is
not available yet?


On a similar note, I know Haris has some updates but these should not be
submitted until after the 3.4.1 point release is out as it would introduce a
change in functionality between a RC and a Release.  Do you have a timescale
for the 3.4.1 final?



Greg Boone wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> There were no further comments on RFC 42:
> http://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/wiki/FDORfc42  - Direct ArcSDE Provider.
> 
> I would like to motion a vote to accept this RFC.
> 
> Thanks,
> Greg.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> fdo-internals mailing list
> fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/MOTION-RFC42-Direct-ArcSDE-Provider-tp4107281p4138387.html
Sent from the FDO Internals mailing list archive at Nabble.com.