[fdo-internals] MOTION -- RFC42 - Direct ArcSDE Provider
greg.boone at autodesk.com
Wed Dec 9 10:36:57 EST 2009
Sorry for the delay. Yes, the motion has been adopted. The state of the RFC can be updated to 'Adopted' accordingly, and the votes recorded.
As for the 3.4.1 point release, we can nominated RC2 to be final at any time. what changes in behavior is Haris proposing? Wouldn't these be better suited for 3.5? I personally prefer not to change functionality (i.e. expected behavior) in a point release.
From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Crispin_at_1Spatial
Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 4:46 AM
To: fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [fdo-internals] MOTION -- RFC42 - Direct ArcSDE Provider
On protocol - the RFC now has 5x +1 and 2x +0.
Is this enough for me to update the RFC with the voting and set the status
to another status?
Does it go to "Adopted" or is that status reserved until implemented - is
there an "Accepted" status that shows the RFC is OK but the development is
not available yet?
On a similar note, I know Haris has some updates but these should not be
submitted until after the 3.4.1 point release is out as it would introduce a
change in functionality between a RC and a Release. Do you have a timescale
for the 3.4.1 final?
Greg Boone wrote:
> Hi all,
> There were no further comments on RFC 42:
> http://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/wiki/FDORfc42 - Direct ArcSDE Provider.
> I would like to motion a vote to accept this RFC.
> fdo-internals mailing list
> fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/MOTION-RFC42-Direct-ArcSDE-Provider-tp4107281p4138387.html
Sent from the FDO Internals mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
fdo-internals mailing list
fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
More information about the fdo-internals