[fdo-internals] FDO PostGIS provider developments

Orest Halustchak orest.halustchak at autodesk.com
Mon Nov 30 14:15:53 EST 2009

Hi Frank,

I would be ok with that.


-----Original Message-----
From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Frank Warmerdam
Sent: Monday, November 30, 2009 1:01 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: Re: [fdo-internals] FDO PostGIS provider developments

Orest Halustchak wrote:
> Hi Haris,
> I see what you're saying about keeping the old provider, but it would be 
> extra work to maintain the two copies. The old one would still be 
> available in the 3.4 branch and the new one in the trunk. Maybe that 
> would be sufficient?


I don't really have an iron in this fire, but my preferred approach would be
to have both versions live in trunk for a while.  Once both are available for
a while and we get feedback on their good and bad points the PSC could decide
on which to support long term.

I think it is a lot to ask the PSC to put the existing provider aside in favor
of a new one that does not yet exist.

Best regards,
I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam, warmerdam at pobox.com
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush    | Geospatial Programmer for Rent

fdo-internals mailing list
fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org

More information about the fdo-internals mailing list