[fdo-internals] Hosting FDO 3.5 builds / Binaries for CentOS and Ubuntu

[Helio Chissini de Castro]

Hello all 

I just did today RPM for FDO trunk, in Fedora 12, using the CMake Build.
I called 3.5.0 anyway, with 0.1 as rpm release. Done for both 32 bits and 64 
bits. Is suitable for Mandriva too with a little tweaks.
Attached is the spec and a patch to approve commit in lib64.
I tried to made it as simple as possible.

[]'s

On Friday 05 February 2010 16:52:46 Trevor Wekel wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> Yes the RPM and .spec files would certainly help for the CentOS builds. 
> The file list in the .spec file should also help with building the .deb
> packages.
> 
> Thanks Greg,
> Trevor
> 
> From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
> [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Greg Boone
> Sent: February 5, 2010 11:27 AM
> To: FDO Internals Mail List
> Subject: RE: [fdo-internals] Hosting FDO 3.5 builds / Binaries for CentOS
> and Ubuntu
> 
> I am not sure about building 32bit binaries on a 64bit OS. Never tried
> that. I know it works the other direction.
> 
> So, I have access to RPM and .spec files for FDO. Is this what you need? I
> guess you need a script to run these as well.
> 
> Greg
> 
> From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
> [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Trevor Wekel
> Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 12:53 PM
> To: FDO Internals Mail List
> Subject: RE: [fdo-internals] Hosting FDO 3.5 builds / Binaries for CentOS
> and Ubuntu
> 
> Hi Greg,
> 
> Starting with Windows is good but I will be working on both Windows and
> Linux in fairly short order.  I am targeting FDO 3.5 but all of the linux
> rpm/deb submissions would have to be ported to trunk as well.
> 
> Do you think we be able to run both the 32 and 64 bit Windows builds on a
> single Windows Web Server 2008 x64 VM?  If so, I will get some of the
> licensing resolved and set up the build machines.  The list of third party
> components/packages will certainly help once the build machines are set
> up.
> 
> Thanks,
> Trevor
> 
> From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
> [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Greg Boone
> Sent: February 5, 2010 10:01 AM
> To: FDO Internals Mail List
> Subject: RE: [fdo-internals] Hosting FDO 3.5 builds / Binaries for CentOS
> and Ubuntu
> 
> This sounds great.
> 
> Maybe we can start with Windows to get going and then move onto the Linux
> distributions?
> 
> Which build of FDO are you targeting? 3.5.0 or trunk or both?
> 
> How would you like to proceed? Do you need a list of Thirdparty
> components\packages you will need to have installed in order to run the
> build?
> 
> Greg
> 
> From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
> [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Trevor Wekel
> Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 11:52 AM
> To: FDO Internals Mail List
> Subject: RE: [fdo-internals] Hosting FDO 3.5 builds / Binaries for CentOS
> and Ubuntu
> 
> Hi Greg,
> 
> Yes.  I was planning to publish all the FDO builds required for MapGuide. 
> This would include 32 and 64 bit binaries for Windows and Linux.  The
> build machines would be accessible via remote desktop and ssh.  We already
> have a small group of build/install maintainers for MapGuide and I would
> be happy to add anyone who wants to help out with FDO.
> 
> I am in the process of getting the software licensing figured out for the
> builds and will be creating new virtual machines over the next couple of
> weeks.  All of the machines will be hosted on a private subnet and exposed
> through a virtual IP address.  Since there will be quite a few VMs to
> orchestrate, I will also be looking into BuildBot and setting up a local
> Subversion proxy to reduce the load on OSGeo.
> 
> Thanks,
> Trevor
> 
> From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
> [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Greg Boone
> Sent: February 5, 2010 9:24 AM
> To: FDO Internals Mail List
> Subject: RE: [fdo-internals] Hosting FDO 3.5 builds / Binaries for CentOS
> and Ubuntu
> 
> Hi Trevor,
> 
> I think I can speak for the PSC and state that this would be a great idea.
> Are you looking to publish both Windows and Linux builds?
> 
> Greg
> 
> 
> From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
> [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Trevor Wekel
> Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 6:36 AM
> To: FDO Internals Mail List
> Subject: [fdo-internals] Hosting FDO 3.5 builds / Binaries for CentOS and
> Ubuntu
> 
> Hi list,
> 
> I am a member of the MapGuide Open Source PSC and responsible for the build
> infrastructure for MGOS.  We are currently looking at revamping the build
> infrastructure for the MapGuide 2.2 release.  Since MapGuide depends
> closely on FDO, we may be able to make better use of the build VMs by
> using them to build FDO as well.
> 
> Since I am already hosting the MapGuide builds, hosting the FDO builds on
> the same VMs would not cost me (or the FDO project) anything.  Regular FDO
> builds (nightly/weekly) can be accommodated.  Builds intended for general
> community use would have to be posted to the OSGeo download site since I
> do not have unlimited bandwidth.
> 
> Moving the FDO builds to community managed infrastructure may provide
> faster turnaround on FDO releases and get the FDO community more involved
> in the project.
> 
> In addition to the builds, I was unable to find any build scripts in the
> FDO repository for creating CentOS rpms or Ubuntu debs.  I am currently
> investigating binary packaging for FDO and will be able to contribute deb
> and rpm creation scripts to the project if they do not already exist.
> 
> Does this sound like an endeavour that the FDO PSC would like to pursue?
> 
> Regards,
> Trevor

-- 
Helio Chissini de Castro
South America and Brazil Primary Contact
KDE Developer since 2002
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: RegistryUtilitity-lib64.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 975 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/fdo-internals/attachments/20100213/44f5233f/RegistryUtilitity-lib64.bin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: fdo.spec
Type: text/x-rpm-spec
Size: 2282 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/fdo-internals/attachments/20100213/44f5233f/fdo.bin