[fdo-internals] Re: FDO 3.5.0 RC2 build

[Greg Boone]

Are there any objections to pushing RC2 out as the official 3.5.0 build?

Greg

-----Original Message-----
From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Greg Boone
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 3:38 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: RE: [fdo-internals] Re: FDO 3.5.0 RC2 build

I have re-loaded new versions of the ArcSDE Win32/Win64 provider tar files. Now built with ArSDE 9.1 and 9.3.1 SDK.

I have uploaded an initial version of the ArcSDE RHEL5 provider tar file. Built with the ArSDE 9.3.1 SDK

-----Original Message-----
From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Greg Boone
Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2010 7:25 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: RE: [fdo-internals] Re: FDO 3.5.0 RC2 build

Yes, according to our developers, the 91 provider is not supported on 64bit.

-----Original Message-----
From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Jackie Ng
Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2010 7:15 PM
To: fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
Subject: [fdo-internals] Re: FDO 3.5.0 RC2 build


Hi Greg,

The 64-bit ArcSDE tarball is missing ArcSDEProvider91.dll

Is this supposed to be correct?

- Jackie
-- 
View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.com/FDO-3-5-0-RC2-build-tp5552296p5573111.html
Sent from the FDO Internals mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
fdo-internals mailing list
fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals
_______________________________________________
fdo-internals mailing list
fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals
_______________________________________________
fdo-internals mailing list
fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals